Posted on Sep 21, 2024
Judges wrestle with latest Supreme Court gun rights opinion - Roll Call
286
43
7
12
12
0
Rahimi was hyped to be about losing 2A rights because of a restraining order, it wasn't. Bottom line was, A Person that is a known danger to their community, as Mr Rahimi was, will not be allowed the protections of the 2nd Amendment. This article is about how Lower Courts are interpreting the SCOTUS decision using personal feelings of what constitutes a "dangerous" person.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
Judges wrestle with latest Supreme Court gun rights opinion - Roll Call
Posted from rollcall.comPosted in these groups: 
2nd Amendment
Supreme Court
2nd Amendment Supreme Court
Posted 8 d ago
Responses: 4
8
8
0
SGT (Join to see) - Looks like this will evolve into a bad scenario for all if we keep marching down the road as we have been of late... Each day we lose some part of the huge puzzle... to radical minded people. Just saying...
(8)
(0)
7
7
0
When I was in high school, the local newspaper company gave each graduate a copy of the US Constitution. On numerous occasions I have read section after section just out of curiosity. I don't claim to be an expert or someone to make interpretations but it's pretty easy to identify those who think they are qualified.
(7)
(0)
SSgt Robert Simonds
Brother so was I starting in the forth grade. WE had to study the constitution learn ever president and what they stood for. My problem is I keep up with the things we were taught in school.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
SFC Casey O'Mally
The problem is that "known danger" or "dangerous person" is FAR too ambiguous.
Known to who? Dangerous to who? Or to WHAT? Imagine banning, for instance, Tulsi Gabbard, because she was placed on a terror watchlist - which would by default label her as both a known danger - and a dangerous person. Imagine, for instance, banning Elon Musk or Joe Rogan because they are considered to be "dangerous persons" due to how they threaten the Democratic narrative machine. Or Donald Trump because he is a "threat to Democracy."
As soon as someone threatens the status quo they can be labeled a danger and stripped of rights. This is the path of Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, and Hitler. I am not saying we are there. I am not saying we will GET there. But allowing these concepts to remain biguous leaves far too much wiggle room for ideologues to head down that path. We need to block the path before they even START on the path.
Known to who? Dangerous to who? Or to WHAT? Imagine banning, for instance, Tulsi Gabbard, because she was placed on a terror watchlist - which would by default label her as both a known danger - and a dangerous person. Imagine, for instance, banning Elon Musk or Joe Rogan because they are considered to be "dangerous persons" due to how they threaten the Democratic narrative machine. Or Donald Trump because he is a "threat to Democracy."
As soon as someone threatens the status quo they can be labeled a danger and stripped of rights. This is the path of Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, and Hitler. I am not saying we are there. I am not saying we will GET there. But allowing these concepts to remain biguous leaves far too much wiggle room for ideologues to head down that path. We need to block the path before they even START on the path.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
there was nothing ambiguous about Rahimi, he was firing a pistol in public, with criminal intent.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google