Posted on Dec 31, 2024
Another City Learns The Hard Way About Reciprocity - The Truth About Guns
254
23
5
9
9
0
it's a win.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,LTC David Brown
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,LTC David Brown
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
Another City Learns The Hard Way About Reciprocity - The Truth About Guns
Posted from thetruthaboutguns.comPosted in these groups: 
2nd Amendment
Gun Control
2nd Amendment Gun Control
Posted 7 d ago
Responses: 3
7
7
0
According to a report from NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), on December 19, the North Dakota Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling dismissing a lawsuit brought by the city of Fargo against the state legislature to block a bill passed back in 2023 that strengthened the state’s preemption law.
According to NRA-ILA, Fargo has banned gun sales in residential-zoned areas, even by licensed FFLs, for many years. The city filed suit against HB 1340 shortly after the bill passed in 2023, arguing that the law violated their ability for local control.
Of course, the new law did violate their ability for local control. That’s exactly what the legislature had intended for it to do. In the recent ruling, the state Supreme Court found that infringing upon the Second Amendment does not fall under the purview of local control, much to the chagrin of Fargo leaders.
According to NRA-ILA, Fargo has banned gun sales in residential-zoned areas, even by licensed FFLs, for many years. The city filed suit against HB 1340 shortly after the bill passed in 2023, arguing that the law violated their ability for local control.
Of course, the new law did violate their ability for local control. That’s exactly what the legislature had intended for it to do. In the recent ruling, the state Supreme Court found that infringing upon the Second Amendment does not fall under the purview of local control, much to the chagrin of Fargo leaders.
(7)
(0)
Sgt Jim Belanus
Fargo is jealous of St Paul_ Minneapolis and want to be in control of the state, unfortunately for them, the rest of the state out votes them. They have a crime rate that far surpasses the entire state and seem to get their way in issues like flood control. Fargo is in the process of building a big ditch to protect them from the red but it's just going to send the water much faster to the north and flood out the entire northern part of the Red River valley.
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
Ain't it funny how those who get elected to office always try to take freedoms away, even though they swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution? Red Foreman says it best.
(5)
(0)
1
1
0
I heard years ago the anti gun groups believe the more laws they can install that cause pro gun groups to go to court will eventually bankrupt them. Then the bogus laws will remain on the books permanently. So when the anti's deliberately violate the Constitution there should be criminal action against them.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google