7
7
0
Interesting 2A arguement. The author; Robert Leider, is an Assistant Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University. Goes so far down the rabbit hole He goes into how the anti-gunners could ban bolt action rifles.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones,
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
Are Rifles Constitutionally Protected Arms?
Posted from standinghisground.com
2nd Amendment
Gun Control
Self Defense
Posted 7 mo ago
Responses: 4
5
5
0
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Note the above never mentions self-defense. ***** BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE*****
Illinois can and should pack sand.
Note the above never mentions self-defense. ***** BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE*****
Illinois can and should pack sand.
(5)
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
You missed the objective..... Being necessary to the security of a free state..... Illinois does not WANT to be a free state.
(1)
(0)
4
4
0
2
2
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google