Posted on Aug 28, 2020

Media Demonizes Apparent Self-Defender Kyle Rittenhouse

2.26K

It's all over the MSM right now. What I seem to be hearing the most is that He's only 17. In 1946, at the age of 17, my Father was Stationed in Nurmberg, as an MP Interior Night Guard for the trials. At the time of my enlistment, a 17yo could go to Basic with a waiver/parental consent. Kyle didn't spray-n-pray, He shot 3 people that had in some manner struck Him first.
TSgt David L., PVT Mark Zehner
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
PO3 Bob McCord, SSG Gordon Holmes,
SGT (Join to see), COL Mikel J. Burroughs,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, Maj Marty Hogan,
1SG Steven Imerman, SGT Gregory Lawritson,
MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi, PO1 John Johnson,
MSgt David Hoffman, SSG Michael Noll,
SPC Nancy Greene, CPL Dave Hoover

Media Demonizes Apparent Self-Defender Kyle Rittenhouse

Posted from ammoland.com

Posted in these groups: 2nd amendment logo

2nd Amendment Refuse

Self Defense Ferguson hands up 3118272k

Riots

Posted 4 y ago

Responses: 7

Sgt (Join to see)

Edited 3 y ago

Posted 4 y ago

SGT (Join to see) Well here we go, real “Justice Warriors” go to work:
https://www.infowars.com/nick-sandmann-attorney-offers-to-represent-kyle-rittenhouse/

Sgt (Join to see) 1SG Cj Grisham SPC Erich Guenther PO1 H Gene Lawrence PO2 (Join to see) AB Edward Mondini SGT Ed Matyjasik MSG Glen Miller Col Joseph LenertzPO1 Robert Payne SSG Michael Noll LCpl Brad Gross Cpl Mark A. Morris SGT Steve McFarland MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D. LTC John Shaw Cpl (Join to see)

Nick Sandmann Attorney Offers to Represent Kyle Rittenhouse

'Charges must be dismissed as video clearly shows justified acts of self-defense,' says lawyer who settled defamation lawsuits against CNN, WAPO

(5)

Comment

(0)

show previous comments

SPC Erich Guenther

4 y

Cpl (Join to see) - Not quite sure what your saying but both the CURFEW and STATE OF EMERGENCY are lawful and if the National Guard had been deployed they would have enforced both via live ammo if necessary.

(0)

SPC Erich Guenther

4 y

Sgt (Join to see) - Yeah there are people still posting on Social Media that believe that BLM should be able to attend riots as long as they are there peacefully and that Law Enforcement or National Guard should be able to differentiate between a peaceful protestor or rioter in a crowd. I keep telling them over and over again. THAT IS NOT HOW THE LAW WORKS. If your at a riot and protesting your a rioter regardless of what your doing at the moment and can be legally charged with rioting. Just the act of being at a riot is rioting and participating with the mob. Unbelievable todays entitled youth do not understand that but then you have liberal politicians like Karmala Harris blurring the lines in political speeches.

(1)

(0)

Cpl (Join to see)

4 y

State nor Federal law supercedes the US Constitution or the Bill of Rights. We are not in a state of martial law. A violation of curfew is a different thing. I misunderstood your comment. I thought you were talking about Rittenhouse breaking the law not the rioters.

(1)

(0)