Posted on Sep 15, 2015
Why are so many people "Dissatisfied" with the Performance of President Obama?
74.5K
1.29K
674
36
22
14
I'm a HUGE Admirer of our President! I Personally Love the job he has done! Especially with what he had to tell with when he took over the Office! Many people seem to Disregard that fact! Why? I don't know! However, many of you seem Dissatisfied! Why? He hasn't done anything for this Country in terms of Moving it Forward? The Country hasn't Progressed under him? What are your Thoughts!
Posted in these groups: 
Legacy
Job Performance
Office of the President (POTUS)
Barack Obama
White House
Legacy Job Performance Office of the President (POTUS) Barack Obama White House
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 147
8
8
0
This POTUS has created his own disrespect, betrayal, treachery, and sabotage of our nation.
(8)
(0)
SGT Christina Wilder
The POTUS response to law enforcement berating them before investigating. One on the East coast and he shared beer between the alleged victim and the LEO, Fetguson, Baltimore. All false flag events supported by the POTUS and his administration.
Lack of accepting responsibility for the increase in unemployed and underemployed because of inaccurate reporting due to unemployment benefits running out.
Benghazi, although not directly responsible certainly the outcome falls to the leader.
All the Islamic Czars in the administration.
Bowing to the Saudi King.
Apologizing worldwide for the US.
Returning the bust if Winston Churchill to England.
Excessive spending of taxpayer money for his wife and children to travel the world.
Going golfing immediately following a very curt meeting with a journalists family regarding his beheading.
Excessive race baiting.
Obamacare. The outrageous costs and inadequate care.
Violation of the ninth and tenth Ammendment by overstepping the 18 enumerated spending clauses in the Constitution.
Do I need to cite more?
Lack of accepting responsibility for the increase in unemployed and underemployed because of inaccurate reporting due to unemployment benefits running out.
Benghazi, although not directly responsible certainly the outcome falls to the leader.
All the Islamic Czars in the administration.
Bowing to the Saudi King.
Apologizing worldwide for the US.
Returning the bust if Winston Churchill to England.
Excessive spending of taxpayer money for his wife and children to travel the world.
Going golfing immediately following a very curt meeting with a journalists family regarding his beheading.
Excessive race baiting.
Obamacare. The outrageous costs and inadequate care.
Violation of the ninth and tenth Ammendment by overstepping the 18 enumerated spending clauses in the Constitution.
Do I need to cite more?
(1)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(2)
(0)
7
7
0
I just happened to look that up today on what he has done while in office, and I think a person's opinion of him boils down to what issues matter to each individual.
Take Iraq for example. Some see it as a win for him because he finally got us out of there, while others see our departure as creating conditions that allowed ISIS to come into power.
Like I said, every person has their own vision of what is good for this country, so there are always going to be those who do not like our President, regardless of who is in office.
Take Iraq for example. Some see it as a win for him because he finally got us out of there, while others see our departure as creating conditions that allowed ISIS to come into power.
Like I said, every person has their own vision of what is good for this country, so there are always going to be those who do not like our President, regardless of who is in office.
(7)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(1)
(0)
6
6
0
I will invoke my Article 31 rights based on Article 88 of the UCMJ. Ask me my opinion after the next inauguration on 20 January 2017...
(6)
(0)
6
6
0
While I personally do not agree with his decisions while in Office, nor with his actions regarding our foreign policies, he is still my Commander in Chief, and he has my backing. I will do what is necessary to defend him and my country, as I am sworn to do. Not because I have any respect for him as a man, but because of my respect for the office that he holds.
(6)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
Capt Jeff S., by any regulation, no. Rank worn is to be earned and awarded. That being said, I do hope that your comment was not directed at me, as I have earned my position and my rank.
(2)
(0)
Capt Jeff S.
Our Commander-in-Chief did not obtain his office legitimately. Evidence of this is everywhere. The only people who don't see it are those who turn a blind eye and deaf ear to the mountain of circumstantial evidence stacked up against Obama. Why is it all circumstantial? Because most all the direct evidence has been destroyed, and what hasn't been destroyed is being ignored by Congress and the Justice Dept.
For example, the Obama campaign forged signatures to get his name on the ballot in Indiana back in 2007. Without the forged signatures, he did not have enough to be on the ballot and as a write in candidate in the States which he did not obtain enough legitimate signatures, he would not have had enough votes to beat Hillary Clinton.
In fact, the Clintons were the first to question Obama's eligibility, and then all of a sudden they got very quiet. Apparently, the powers that be decided it was not Hillary's time to be elected and they wanted Barack instead. And unfortunately, Hillary's corruption and lying are ensuring that this election cycle isn't going to be her time either. Her window of opportunity is pretty much closed.
Indiana is but one state where Obama's campaign committed election fraud, yet every lawsuit challenging Obama's eligibility has been tossed over trumped up technicalities by crooked judges with ties to the Obama Administration.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio conducted an extensive investigation into Barack Obama's eligibility, determined that the documents Obama used to establish his eligibility were computer generated forgeries, presented his findings to Congress, and NOT ONE! Congressman has followed up on it. My guess is that nobody in Congress wants to address it because too many folks from both sides of the aisle would be implicated as knowing that Obama was ineligible and yet they did nothing to stop him from becoming our (p)Resident.
Can one obtain elected office fraudulently and then give a lawful order to our military? SHOULD our military obey orders from one who doesn't meet the constitutional qualifications of office? For those who think Obama is legit, WHY would Nancy Pelosi remove the words "constitutionally qualified" from her endorsement? WHY go through the trouble to change the standard wording of the Democratic Party Presidential endorsement? These are questions I pose to the members of Rallypoint.
For example, the Obama campaign forged signatures to get his name on the ballot in Indiana back in 2007. Without the forged signatures, he did not have enough to be on the ballot and as a write in candidate in the States which he did not obtain enough legitimate signatures, he would not have had enough votes to beat Hillary Clinton.
In fact, the Clintons were the first to question Obama's eligibility, and then all of a sudden they got very quiet. Apparently, the powers that be decided it was not Hillary's time to be elected and they wanted Barack instead. And unfortunately, Hillary's corruption and lying are ensuring that this election cycle isn't going to be her time either. Her window of opportunity is pretty much closed.
Indiana is but one state where Obama's campaign committed election fraud, yet every lawsuit challenging Obama's eligibility has been tossed over trumped up technicalities by crooked judges with ties to the Obama Administration.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio conducted an extensive investigation into Barack Obama's eligibility, determined that the documents Obama used to establish his eligibility were computer generated forgeries, presented his findings to Congress, and NOT ONE! Congressman has followed up on it. My guess is that nobody in Congress wants to address it because too many folks from both sides of the aisle would be implicated as knowing that Obama was ineligible and yet they did nothing to stop him from becoming our (p)Resident.
Can one obtain elected office fraudulently and then give a lawful order to our military? SHOULD our military obey orders from one who doesn't meet the constitutional qualifications of office? For those who think Obama is legit, WHY would Nancy Pelosi remove the words "constitutionally qualified" from her endorsement? WHY go through the trouble to change the standard wording of the Democratic Party Presidential endorsement? These are questions I pose to the members of Rallypoint.
(4)
(0)
SPC (Join to see)
You are remarkably well informed of these things. I may at a later date, pick your brain a bit. And you have my apologies for the assumption of accusation, But I can see how the comment, given the tone of the thread, could be miscontrued to either side.
(2)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(1)
(0)
12
6
6
SSgt (Join to see)
All these wars he "shut dow ", we had to start over and a few new ones to try and stanch the flow of bad coming the river. He wants to give Nukes to a country that still hates our guts.
(1)
(0)
CPO Greg Frazho
That meme above with Obama presiding over that laundry list of "accomplishments" is somewhere between delusional and ludicrous.
(1)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
Are we raising a generation of sheep? Is no one out there in possession of a brain? Why can't you see what is right in front of your face? The man is a fake. He has done absolutely nothing that does not benefit him, not us. Four other presidents rounded up ALL the illegal aliens in this country and had them deported. The world did not come to an end and the country was better off. Why are we giving law breakers a break? Being in the US illegally is against the law. Obama wants to pardon them all. Petraeus leaked ONE classified document to his girlfriend and was fired in disgrace. Hillary Clinton leaked thousands of classified documents, erased many thousands of e-mails and did not even get a slap on the wrist. What kind of country are we in? I did not do 6 tours in Vietnam to defend criminals.
(1)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(1)
(0)
13
6
7
Capt Walter Miller
Sgt Richard Buckner - "Don't argue with a liberal, they will wear you down with stupidity to their level, Then they will beat you with experience."
Put another way, you can't counter the liberal argument.
Walt
Put another way, you can't counter the liberal argument.
Walt
(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(0)
(0)
Capt Walter Miller
CPO Jack De Merit - 1. Then state senator Obama said in 2002 it was folly to invade Iraq.
2. President Obama has said, and said yesterday that large numbers of US troops on the ground in Syria just won’t work. And CMOH winner Col. Jack Jacobs said the same thing on Saturday. It is total folly for us to have our guys killed on the ground where no one we support will work to keep it.
3. I head half a dozen times this weekend that President Obama’s –strategy- of containing ISIS HAS WORKED. ISIS now controls about 25% less territory than it did a year ago. This, according to analysis I heard yesterday, is why ISIS is now fomenting locals in various countries to attack civilians at will. Otherwise, ISIS is irrelevant and powerless.
4. Refer back to #3. The president’s policy on ISIS is working.
5. The type of attack we saw in Paris is -undetectable-. No intelligence agency can discern who is in their basements looking at ISIS websites and coordinating the receipt of assault rifles, suicide vests, communication gear and the other tools of terror attack.
6. An appeal to hearts and minds is the only way to address the underlying causes of these attacks. That would absolutely include allowing carefully vetted Syrian citizens into this country. And the president knows that is “Who we are.”
Walt
2. President Obama has said, and said yesterday that large numbers of US troops on the ground in Syria just won’t work. And CMOH winner Col. Jack Jacobs said the same thing on Saturday. It is total folly for us to have our guys killed on the ground where no one we support will work to keep it.
3. I head half a dozen times this weekend that President Obama’s –strategy- of containing ISIS HAS WORKED. ISIS now controls about 25% less territory than it did a year ago. This, according to analysis I heard yesterday, is why ISIS is now fomenting locals in various countries to attack civilians at will. Otherwise, ISIS is irrelevant and powerless.
4. Refer back to #3. The president’s policy on ISIS is working.
5. The type of attack we saw in Paris is -undetectable-. No intelligence agency can discern who is in their basements looking at ISIS websites and coordinating the receipt of assault rifles, suicide vests, communication gear and the other tools of terror attack.
6. An appeal to hearts and minds is the only way to address the underlying causes of these attacks. That would absolutely include allowing carefully vetted Syrian citizens into this country. And the president knows that is “Who we are.”
Walt
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
He is a professed Marxist seeking to transition a mature Capitalist State to a Socialist State. According to Karl Marx, it is the only transition to Socialism. Seven years in office has resulted in global turmoil which is the underlying "Change" he was put into office to instigate. I was in Eastern Europe starting up a new company, watching Russian TV when Colonel Gaddafi (Muammar Gaddafi) professed on international TV - "We have finally raised enough money to put one of our on into office as the President of the United States." Why do you think Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama singled him out and targeted him for assassination? Dead men tale no tales.
Consider this, as a business man, I know about profit and loss of companies. Pay your bills, remain solvent and you will succeed. The "CHANGE" occurred when POTUS instigated a global collapse of the economic system to divert power. Many of my business colleagues where well established and maintained solvent business practices. Yet, the lending institutions "Called in their loans". Why?
Consider this! How do you destabilize an economy? First, target solvent companies. Cause the economic infrastructure to collapse. Second, flood the systems with "Wards of the State" or better know as Welfare dependents. This has been accomplished. In addition, add to the populace additional welfare dependents such as illegally granting rights and benefits to ILLEGAL ALIENS. Granting illegal aliens the right to vote. Then add in the right to vote for convicted fellons. That is how you successfully collapse a once stable system. Then "Change" it, the system to align with socialist values and principles. Hell, it is clear that the pendulum is swinging towards total anarchy. Burney Sanders, Democratic Presidential Candidate and US Senator is a professed Socialist.
Frankilin D. Roosevelt and his cabinet where Anti-Semmitic. The White House chose to capture market shares as Nazi Germany and the Islamic World united to defeat Russia. FDR and his Secretary of State controlled by the Steel Barrons of America choose to supply steel to the war machine as he sat back and allowed 6.5 million jews to be slaughtered. Understand that the Axis Alliance (Germany/Italy) and Anti-Comintern Pact (Germany/Japan) concluded in 1936. Wake up and realize the Hindenburg arrived in the US in 1937 as a marketing campaign to gain further business allegiance with Nazi Germany. By 1938 the Jews were targeted for extinction. Then Hitler and Stalin decided how to divide Poland between the two powers. Sound familiar today.
When the US started providing steel to Russia also, Nazi Germany who was aligned with Japan is 1936, directed Japan to stop the flow of steel and ammunition to Russia by attacking the US. Sound familiar. Curious how the US evacuated all the great German minds, aligned with Sunni Arabs and poof---start of the Cold War.
Amazing how America is aligned with Sunni Arabs and Russia is aligning with Shia Muslims. Nazi Germany was also aligned with Sunni Arabs. Amazing how the turn of events occurred.
Follow the money trail.
My opinion, Obama deliberately created a vacuum in the Middle East to promote the rise of the Islamic State. It was working until Vladimir Puttin stepped in and decided to support the Shia Muslims including Iraq and Syria. The Balance of Power scale is tipping. Thanks to Barak Obama. Let us not forget that the US provided funding in Yemen to the leaders that revolted causing a new civil war. Just like Obama and Hillary targeted the leaders of Libya and Syria. The day the US SoS make a public announce that the leader of a country should be assassinated is the first day of the collapse of the United States of America.
Consider this, as a business man, I know about profit and loss of companies. Pay your bills, remain solvent and you will succeed. The "CHANGE" occurred when POTUS instigated a global collapse of the economic system to divert power. Many of my business colleagues where well established and maintained solvent business practices. Yet, the lending institutions "Called in their loans". Why?
Consider this! How do you destabilize an economy? First, target solvent companies. Cause the economic infrastructure to collapse. Second, flood the systems with "Wards of the State" or better know as Welfare dependents. This has been accomplished. In addition, add to the populace additional welfare dependents such as illegally granting rights and benefits to ILLEGAL ALIENS. Granting illegal aliens the right to vote. Then add in the right to vote for convicted fellons. That is how you successfully collapse a once stable system. Then "Change" it, the system to align with socialist values and principles. Hell, it is clear that the pendulum is swinging towards total anarchy. Burney Sanders, Democratic Presidential Candidate and US Senator is a professed Socialist.
Frankilin D. Roosevelt and his cabinet where Anti-Semmitic. The White House chose to capture market shares as Nazi Germany and the Islamic World united to defeat Russia. FDR and his Secretary of State controlled by the Steel Barrons of America choose to supply steel to the war machine as he sat back and allowed 6.5 million jews to be slaughtered. Understand that the Axis Alliance (Germany/Italy) and Anti-Comintern Pact (Germany/Japan) concluded in 1936. Wake up and realize the Hindenburg arrived in the US in 1937 as a marketing campaign to gain further business allegiance with Nazi Germany. By 1938 the Jews were targeted for extinction. Then Hitler and Stalin decided how to divide Poland between the two powers. Sound familiar today.
When the US started providing steel to Russia also, Nazi Germany who was aligned with Japan is 1936, directed Japan to stop the flow of steel and ammunition to Russia by attacking the US. Sound familiar. Curious how the US evacuated all the great German minds, aligned with Sunni Arabs and poof---start of the Cold War.
Amazing how America is aligned with Sunni Arabs and Russia is aligning with Shia Muslims. Nazi Germany was also aligned with Sunni Arabs. Amazing how the turn of events occurred.
Follow the money trail.
My opinion, Obama deliberately created a vacuum in the Middle East to promote the rise of the Islamic State. It was working until Vladimir Puttin stepped in and decided to support the Shia Muslims including Iraq and Syria. The Balance of Power scale is tipping. Thanks to Barak Obama. Let us not forget that the US provided funding in Yemen to the leaders that revolted causing a new civil war. Just like Obama and Hillary targeted the leaders of Libya and Syria. The day the US SoS make a public announce that the leader of a country should be assassinated is the first day of the collapse of the United States of America.
(4)
(0)
SCPO Carl Wayne Boss
No Miller; It's not nuts. Unlike you apparently... and unfortunately a lot of Americans... LTC Nance knows History AND has been paying attention to current events for a long time, instead of watching football and playing video games. All of what the LTC is History, as well as fact.
O'Bama and his atheistic, socialistic, progressivist administration, have set the dominoes of destabilization in motion and only the blind or those who chose NOT to see, can remain unaware, or perhaps a better term is oblivious to the facts.
The very saddest part is, it's gone to the point we may not be able to reclaim our country so that our children and grandchildren may be raised with the same kind of freedoms, liberties an prosperity that we enjoyed. And if that's ok with you...you may just be one of the domestic enemies... the oath you took talked about.
O'Bama and his atheistic, socialistic, progressivist administration, have set the dominoes of destabilization in motion and only the blind or those who chose NOT to see, can remain unaware, or perhaps a better term is oblivious to the facts.
The very saddest part is, it's gone to the point we may not be able to reclaim our country so that our children and grandchildren may be raised with the same kind of freedoms, liberties an prosperity that we enjoyed. And if that's ok with you...you may just be one of the domestic enemies... the oath you took talked about.
(0)
(0)
5
4
1
Capt Walter Miller
CPT L S
I wrote this a while back. Fifty years of being average at best.
- Johnson – fought a war to look tough on communism. Dummy. Negates credible effort on Great Society and Voting Rights Act.
Nixon – almost impeached when he ordered the Watergate break-in. Also paranoid nutball and for the cherry on top vetoed the Clean Water Act. Raised in a strict Quaker household, was caught on tape using the most vile epithets against Jews, Blacks and others.
Ford – A Ford not a Lincoln. Did create a bubble demand for “Whip Inflation Now” lapel pins. Abandoned the rule of law and pissed off beaucoup people by pardoning Nixon. On the other hand worked a sweet deal to be president -- by pardoning Nixon.
Carter – Nice guy. I can’t stand to hear his voice. Was once attacked by a savage rabbit while boating. Mortgage rates went to 21%.
Reagan – Gave US property to the Mullahs in Tehran; swore never to negotiate with terrorists but did exactly that, turned tail and ran after the Beirut bombing, conducted illegal activity in Central American and the Middle East, took credit for a 70 year process – the collapse of the USSR, and oh – tripled the national debt in 8 years.
Bush 41: Read my lips: “I am an idiot.” Gave a perceived green light to Iraq to invade Kuwait.
Clinton – Did have sex with that woman. Allowed the Glass-Stegal Act to be repealed – passed in the 1930’s to prevent what happened in 2008, forcing Bush 43 to sign the $700B TARP Act.
Bush 43 – didn’t finish obligated commitment to the Air National Guard. Never took a flight physical after the institution of urinalysis. Ignored warnings of impending terror attacks in the US. Invaded Iraq with no plan past the first 3 weeks. Make the lack of aiding New Orleans a national disgrace. Advocated tax breaks for the rich just before embarking on huge expenditures for war.
I wrote this a while back. Fifty years of being average at best.
- Johnson – fought a war to look tough on communism. Dummy. Negates credible effort on Great Society and Voting Rights Act.
Nixon – almost impeached when he ordered the Watergate break-in. Also paranoid nutball and for the cherry on top vetoed the Clean Water Act. Raised in a strict Quaker household, was caught on tape using the most vile epithets against Jews, Blacks and others.
Ford – A Ford not a Lincoln. Did create a bubble demand for “Whip Inflation Now” lapel pins. Abandoned the rule of law and pissed off beaucoup people by pardoning Nixon. On the other hand worked a sweet deal to be president -- by pardoning Nixon.
Carter – Nice guy. I can’t stand to hear his voice. Was once attacked by a savage rabbit while boating. Mortgage rates went to 21%.
Reagan – Gave US property to the Mullahs in Tehran; swore never to negotiate with terrorists but did exactly that, turned tail and ran after the Beirut bombing, conducted illegal activity in Central American and the Middle East, took credit for a 70 year process – the collapse of the USSR, and oh – tripled the national debt in 8 years.
Bush 41: Read my lips: “I am an idiot.” Gave a perceived green light to Iraq to invade Kuwait.
Clinton – Did have sex with that woman. Allowed the Glass-Stegal Act to be repealed – passed in the 1930’s to prevent what happened in 2008, forcing Bush 43 to sign the $700B TARP Act.
Bush 43 – didn’t finish obligated commitment to the Air National Guard. Never took a flight physical after the institution of urinalysis. Ignored warnings of impending terror attacks in the US. Invaded Iraq with no plan past the first 3 weeks. Make the lack of aiding New Orleans a national disgrace. Advocated tax breaks for the rich just before embarking on huge expenditures for war.
(0)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
Is all a matter of political vision and the difference of opinions each individual has based in some of the good and bad decisions he has made over his presidential tenure.
For me in an unbiased way of looking at it, it is obvious that the level of satisfaction has been greater than the opposite, as he won his second term re-election, and that speaks highly of this fact.
For me in an unbiased way of looking at it, it is obvious that the level of satisfaction has been greater than the opposite, as he won his second term re-election, and that speaks highly of this fact.
(4)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
I'll tell you a reason. Social Media! Imagine if other presidents would have had social media the way we have it now. Other Presidents weren't covered like this except for Bush. Before that social media wasn't as big or possibly even around like it is now. It is a lot easier to pull up facts and pull up stories to see what is going on in this world. Before you had to watch the news and read the paper. Now you can see how much BS is actually pushed by the news and the papers. Just a changing of the times. The next POTUS will go through this as well.
(4)
(0)
CPO Jack De Merit
"If Obama cannot rise to the challenge of leadership in this historic crisis, then, for the good of humanity, he should resign. Those are the only options and it is his duty to decide."
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google