Avatar feed
Responses: 5
Lt Col Charlie Brown
5
5
0
We need a secure border. And stop feeding and indulging those who have no business being here.
(5)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
1 y
Exactly so!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM Chuck Stafford
5
5
0
A secure border would've been cheaper for the taxpayers
(5)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
1 y
Of that I'm sure!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Trent Klug
2
2
0
I believe it maybe time for religions to lose their tax exemption status since they want to be involved in political activities and law enforcement
(2)
Comment
(0)
Amn Dale Preisach
Amn Dale Preisach
1 y
501c3 is what keeps them from getting directly involved in either commenting for or against a politician. Which ever politician may be fouling up or making good. The clergy steer clear of direct involvement vs or for a particular politician.
This includes every clergy person of any Parish . But either demonstrating for a human rights argument / issue, what else is the church supposed to do??
Not feed the hungry, not harbor those persons that are being hounded by a government? Even when that government is mostly benevolent?? What is the use of asking for sanctuary when the church would turn their back on the persons ? The Church is their intercessor , their negotiator, and if necessary, their " travel Agent. Why have an organization that proclaims to help the less fortunate but never abides by that proclamation ?? We already have such persons in Governments world wide.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC Trent Klug
LTC Trent Klug
1 y
Amn Dale Preisach Youre correct, but the Church is going against what you posted. I have zero problems with religion(s), but they need a course correction onthis issue.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close