Analysis: ACLU Warns of Government Overreach in Second Amendment Case [Member Exclusive]

Wait, what? The ACLU?
'“The historical record is replete with relevant analogues, from 17th century England to the colonial era to Reconstruction, in which governments restricted gun possession by **persons individually adjudged to pose a risk to others**,(Emphasis mine)” the ACLU wrote in its brief."
This is where their brief falls on it's face, Rahimi never went to court until the gun charge came up, so He had never been "individually adjudged". Even though SCOTUS decided in "Bruen" that any further decisions had to be made while considering what the Founders might have been thinking, the ACLU tries to bring, older British Common Law, and more modern restrictions in to the argument, the very things "Bruen" threw to the side in the decision. Basically telling SCOTUS; 'We know you said these other times and situations don't have standing in this matter but, in Our woke mindset, You just HAVE to consider them relevant to the matter at hand'.
But then the ACLU goes on it's Brief to say that a whole bunch of other gun bans are unconstitutional. You'll have to read the whole thing to see those, wherein the ACLU does an about face and denies the the times a situations they argue as germane in Rahimi, don't work any more.
I'm thinking, they can't have it both ways.
SGT James Murphy, CPT Jack Durish,
SPC Gary Welch, SGT Mark Anderson,
CPL Douglas Chrysler, LTC Trent Klug,
CSM Charles Hayden, SMSgt David A Asbury,
SSG William Jones, MSgt Robert "Rock" Aldi
SSG Michael Noll, MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
SGM Erik Marquez, CW3 Harvey K.
SFC William Farrell, CPL Ronald Keyes Jr
Sgt (Join to see), SSG (Join to see)
1SG Dan Capri, LTC (Join to see)