Avatar feed
Responses: 4
Lt Col Charlie Brown
6
6
0
Yes, but that truth doesn't fit the left/liberal narrative SGT (Join to see)
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aircraft Pneudraulics Repairer
3
3
0
What a joke. After clicking on this unsecured blog written by God knows who....we'll call him/her "admin." I'm scrolling through and the author references "this one study" which is a blog entry they wrote two years prior. I'm sure none of this is based off empirical research.
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Kevin B.
LTC Kevin B.
>1 y
And the blog entry from two years earlier references just one study. What does that study indicate? Try not to laugh as you read this:

-87% of the respondents have owned or carried a gun
-81% of the respondents have been shot or shot at

The only study referenced by either blog actually undermines their own blogs. You can't make up this stuff.

If those blogs had been submitted anywhere for a peer review, they would have been immediately rejected.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Robert Bauman
3
3
0
I spent my youth as a Minnesota Deer Hunter. I spent 15 months in Viet Nam carrying an M14 with Bi-pod and selector switch and then an M16.
I rarely used the Auto because it wastes ammo and with M60 Operators the "Life Span" of an Automatic Weapon in Combat is about 60 SECONDS!! You enemy wants you taken out quickly.
There is NO REASON for anyone to NEED a Weapon that fires 30 rounds in 60 seconds on the Streets nor in the Schools of America. Real Hunters would never use such a weapon in the field because they are hunting for FOOD and that many rounds will destroy all the eatable meat!
How many REAL Hunters have left the NRA because of the belief that it is better to kill innocent children than hunt for food?
Statistics are not in play hear, LIVES ARE!!!
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close