Avatar feed
Responses: 9
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
Edited >1 y ago
9af7be00
LTC Stephen F. - Source? Under what legal authority? With whose funding? How does anyone plan to defend this proposed Infrastructure investment against Syrian, Iraqi, ISIL, Daesh, etc, and Russian threats -- without triggering World War III ??? This base was captured on 3/26/2017 and is presently under nominal control of the Kurdish SDF / Arab / Assyrian Militias -- not the US -- and this could change at any time. The base is easily within range of Syrian OTR-21 Tochka / SS-21 Scarab TBMs -- so it is really not very defensible. Quite frankly, while Tabqa had a single decent concrete 9842 x 131 foot primary runway - US / Coalition Forces destroyed all of the supporting structures and punched a lot of holes in the primary and secondary runways. ISIL also did their level best to completely disable / destroy the primary and secondary runways. While the SDF commander may be effectively saying come and get it -- Tabqa AFB is not at all operational - requiring extensive repairs to runway surfaces, new fuel reservoirs and distribution system, electrical generators and distribution system, runway lights, NAVAIDs (TACAN/ILS), air traffic control tower, revetments, hangers, munitions bunkers, support / maintenance buildings, quarters, mess facilities, and perimiter security structures before it can be considered minimally operational. Maybe you can run some rotary / VTOL aircraft out of this facility - but Tabqa is a long way from handling fast movers, JSTARS / C4I, major cargo transports, or ground attack aircraft. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)

CSM Charles Hayden PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
LTC Stephen F.
LTC Stephen F.
>1 y
1LT Sandy Annala the details no doubt are classified. I have found DEBKA and Jane's to be generally reliable sources for information about the middle east and SW Asia. Since they are not subject to US laws DEBKA can publish information that can't be published here.
When I worked in the strategic planning "areas" in the Pentagon [2001 to 2008] I found DEBKA provided information which frequently dovetailed with some of our sensitive sources. Our sources tended to provide some additional details.
The Kurdish controlled areas are much more stable than Iraq and Syria. The Kurds were our only allies during the no-fly zone enforcement between Desert Storm and OIF.
The Kurdish Peshmerga have been much more supportive for us than the Turks have been. We had problems at Incirlik when the attempted coup took place last year in Turkey.
The image certainly does include Taqba which is being modified, most likely.
The other five are Hajar airport in the Rmelan region, two small air fields serving farm transport in Qamishli, which have been converted to military us; and a fifth in the Kurdish Kobani enclave north of Aleppo near the Syrian-Turkish border.
I trust my friends and classmates Gen Joe Votel [CENTCOM] and GEN Tony Thomas [SOCOM] as they ... in that AOR.
LTC John Shaw LTC Greg Henning LTC Stephen C. CPT Gabe Snell
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Jason Mackay
LTC Jason Mackay
>1 y
this doesn't strike me as plausible. At least not right now.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
>1 y
Ee3c1cb1
GySgt John Olson - To be clear - there is nothing touching on classified matter in my note - all of the details and the photo are open source - and extensively discussed. I just don't want anyone thinking we are going to have a 10,000 foot runway up & running any time soon - without a few months of work refurbishing the runway surfaces & minimal essential support structures. The heavily damaged runway surface would not be survivable for use as an emergency landing site - much less as a marshaling ground for either opposition forces or coalition forces. There is effectively nothing useful at this site - and anyone trying to rebuild infrastructure will no doubt come under exceptionally heavy missile fire from the Syrian government. At least at Incirlik - whatever you may speculate about the site - we can house our fastest and heaviest aircraft, troops, and support facilities in a manner safe from Syrian government attacks. We cannot duplicate this at Tabqa. Warmest Regards, Sandy :)
SSG Warren Swan
2
2
0
Sir this would be one HELL of a bad mistake after the last week we've had with the Russians. IF we did that with our relations with the Russians, the Kurds, the Turks, and damn near everyone else, with this move would put us on an island with all the sharks around us. Not a fan of this "so-called" alliance with Turkey, but there is a bit of control we can exercise there, but not in Syria. Stay OUT of Syria. We already have our plates overflowing as is. We would really destabilize the region if we put BOG, and how long before others notice how thin we are and start taking cracks on Israel? Personally I don't care, but since everyone wants to "pledge support" for them, I guess using me as example my opinion would mean nothing compared to those who value Israel's safety over the safety of our own troops. I do not "stand" with Israel or any other foreign nation except Texas and California. I stand with America, will do what I can for her, and prepare for BOHICA when it comes and it WILL come.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
2
2
0
I wouldn't give too much Credence to that Phrase "Move AF Resources to Syria" at this Point but Moving out of Incirlik at this Point makes sense. Incirlik was a Great Place to Spy on the Russians on during the Cold War and Doubly So after we had to shut down our Operations in Iran. Now if I have to choose between Incirlik and Protecting an Intellectual like Gulen, I would tell Turkey to Pack Sand on the Rent Check, We're Moving. Call Me a Romantic if You Must.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close