Posted on Sep 27, 2013
CPT Aaron Kletzing
64.2K
1.87K
661
49
49
0
As the military enters a significant downsizing period, it's important to talk through relevant issues and solutions. &nbsp;Enter your response below, and if it gets the most Up votes, you win a free iPad Mini and we will personally deliver your thoughts to our Advisory Board, which includes retired Generals George Casey and Norton Schwartz, the recent Chiefs of Staff of the Army and Air Force, respectively.<div><br></div><div>Tip: Get all your friends to vote Up your response by the end of the contest on Oct 7, 2013.</div>
Posted in these groups: 702767d5 Downsizing
Avatar feed
Responses: 502
SFC Warrior In Transition
0
0
0
Absolutely ensure your veteran leaders are taken care of. If we get rid of all the old timers, who have the experience, in lieu of a younger force, we lose a wealth of knowledge that kept us as a world military power. Screw over the seniors, they leave and the juniors have to fend for themselves.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC George Tobias III
0
0
0
Information, information, and more information. I went through this same saga duing the drawdown after Vietnam, the lustrious buyout of the 90's, and seeing it again after our departure from 2 different but very related wars. Soldiers need to know exactly what is happening. This starts at the top. The Generals charged with the responsibility to implement various programs and uses of data to swing service members career one  way or the other, need to get the information down to the lowest level. It should not be a surprise for someone to find out their career is ending. 85% or more of this could be done through natural attrition.  If this is going to be a witch hunt, let the terminology and issues be placed on the table now. These drawdown's, once started, seem to pick up pace. And sadly, a lot of extraordinary officers and NCO's will simply just hang their hat up and walk away. Loyalty doesn't seem to buy the brownie points they used to. Everyone is a pawn in this win or lose drama, whether intended or not. I wish the best to all those coming back form the middle east and now have to have the stress of this hanging over their soldiers. I WISH THEM THE BEST OF LUCK!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Waldo Yamada
0
0
0
The traditions and leadership is deteriorating. These are the big effect to the Army. They should also note that the XYZ generation is a truly unique bunch and are tech savvy. This brings a lot of debate of changing and adapting. I sure do want to see a motivated soldier and to find his motif is a challenging one, which there should be an MBTI emplaced for each enlistee in the Army for proper placement and configuration for a unit, if that is not possible. Then in order to keep soldiers from mental attrition is to use the Army's emotional test such as the GAT. Captains should take closer look at these and NCO's should be aware and trained for these situations. A lot of XYZ soldiers becomes those who were wronged and or depressed for a lot of reasons and that all depends on proper active listening skills.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Humint Technician
0
0
0
It's really simple I think. Uphold current standards and quit rushing to change standards (reference the upcoming 670-1). The current standards are fine if enforced. Quit over inflating evaluation reports and kick people out that can't meet the standard. UCMJ = denial of continued service for SSG and above. Start punishing officers more. I can't count how many times I've seen an officer and NCO pair disciplined for their actions. The officer is shuffled to another job without anything serious in their record and the NCO gets a career ending eval. I had a commander and 1SG pair before I took over as 1SG. 1SG was relieved and given all kinds of negative marks. The commander who encouraged his career ending behavior was not only not disciplined (given a local letter of concern only) but had his command time extended. The company did not improve until the commander changed out no matter what I tried to do as 1SG. Once he left the company did a 180. The 1SG who was relived was the biggest dirtbag I've ever encountered but I still don't think it was fair that he was destroyed and the officer was not. 
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Thomas Lucken
0
0
0
First of all, get rid of the CINC!!!!!!
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Jason Porter
0
0
0
As the force gets smaller, I believe in retention to keep the best quality service members in and serving. Offer incentives for doing it and not destroying retire pay for starters! schools is key, taking care of family, realistic training. You have to make it worth while if you do not you will loose the quality service members we need. Also the service needs to ensure they mentor and teach with discipline and high standards.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC S1 Personnel Clerk
0
0
0
Transparency on unit spending.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Ryan Tanner
0
0
0
Cimg0615
Stay out of the politics. Set the example for the rest of the population, but stay the course!
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ J5 Strategic Plans And Training Officer
MAJ (Join to see)
11 y
Agreed
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG John Wirts
MSG John Wirts
10 y
I agree we should not appear in political campaign rallies, especially not in uniform. We must however vote in candidates , who are patriotic, moral, honest and will adhere to their oath of office
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG(P) Casualty Operations Ncoic
0
0
0

It seems simple, but if the Army wants to downsize, let's ask for volunteers first.  Get all the "FTA" Privates and Specialists out voluntarily.  This frees up more flexibility to allow experienced and valuable Soldiers to stay in the Army.  Yes, we must take a hard look at everyone, but those with experience, a good behavioral record, and a true desire to make the Army a career should be retained. 


If we also cut down on initial enlistment, it would also free up more flexibility to retain quality Soldiers.  It makes little sense to keep bringing in new Soldiers who need to be trained rather than retain experienced Soldiers.


We have lots of Wounded Warriors who still want to serve.  Perhaps they can be utilized in posts that can be vacated by civilian contractors.  Perhaps I.T. and other administrative roles could be made available to these Soldiers (based on their capabilities).  This would go a long way towards maintaining morale and perhaps cutting some costs.


Cut DFACs.  At Fort Campbell, a brand new DFAC was built out at the Gate 10 Aviation barracks.  Since these barracks and DFAC are on the opposite side of the post from where most of these Soldiers work, no one was using the DFAC.  The DFAC was shut down and everyone was given BAS, but the building stood empty.  Closer to Campbell AAF, the Son DFAC was closed most of the time I was stationed at Fort Campbell.  Upon investigation, I was told that it was being refurbished.  Once it was completed, the cost to operate it was higher than giving BAS to the Aviation Soldiers who lived close by.  At the Fort Campbell NCOA DFAC, Soldiers attending WLC are forced to eat there for two meals per day because the NCOA CSM wanted to keep "his" DFAC.  Most of the Soldiers who attend the NCOA live on post or in the nearby area.  That is an ongoing and wasteful expense.


(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Robert Berry
0
0
0
I think that all personnel, (regardless of rank,) Should be either reminded of, or educated on the oath of office they all took before they entered service and its meaning.

                            - R.J. Berry
(0)
Comment
(0)
MSG John Wirts
MSG John Wirts
10 y
Same goes for civilian employees, law enforcement, politicians, lawyers, and judges!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close