Posted on Sep 2, 2016
CW2 C2 Systems Integrator
31K
280
110
17
17
0
0c3a586
Units are being told to select new female armor and infantry officers for platoon leader positions ahead of their male counterparts who have been waiting for the position.

Not sure if this guidance has extended to the NCO side.
Avatar feed
Responses: 54
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
25
25
0
CW2 (Join to see) In my opinion leadership should positions should be based on an Order of Merit list of the best and brightest qualified individuals (not based on female, male, or transgender). The best and brightest that have earned the right to lead through merit, time in grade, time in service, and past accomplishments - my opinion!
(25)
Comment
(0)
CPT Richard Fematt
CPT Richard Fematt
8 y
I'm going to be the elephant in the room women in command of infantry units just won't work regardless if she cuts the mustard! These are hardened combat tested soldies who knows what it's like to actually be in combat not sitting in a fortified office in a large base safe from hostile action except an occasional incoming blast! You can not expect soldiers to follow a non combat soldier regardless of rank or gender!!! Respect is earned not because you wear the officer rank but because you've proven yourself! This is a social experiment that is destined to failure of epic porportions! The Marines are the only branch of service who have tge balls to stand up to these PC libtards who are destroying the military! There will be a new group of children raised without a mother for what the chance to die all in tge quest for equality! Glad I'm retired cause I wouldn't happy to follow this I'll fated edict!!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Jeff Couch
SFC Jeff Couch
8 y
SFC Emerson "Zeus" Hazzard - I don't think we will find the awnser SFC until we as a people start thinking with knowledge and not forced into a awnser
(1)
Reply
(0)
SP6 Cajun Ray
SP6 Cajun Ray
8 y
CPT Richard Fematt - "You can not expect soldiers to follow a non combat soldier regardless of rank or gender!!!" No, you expect Soldiers to follow the orders of those appointed over them. I retired about six years ago but isn't that still in the Oath of Enlistment?

It is no better for a child to be raised without a father than to be raised without a mother. That is a ridiculous argument.

ALL Soldiers, including Females, should be placed into units based on an order of merit list using a number system in the same way that senior NCOs receive a number when selected for promotion and are promoted when their number comes up.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPT Richard Fematt
CPT Richard Fematt
8 y
SP6 Cajun Ray - it may be a ridiculous argument but I've been there seen how noncombatant soldiers are seeing by those that have actually engaged in real combat operations! It's just a fact and like I said it's a social experiment destined to failure! It is a time honored tradition that men go off to war and some don't come back it's a risk all military families accept! Most men are just not ready to take on the role of a mother. It's human nature to look at a senior ranking officer or SNCO without the combat patch in a different way! There is just no way an officer can understand what his soldiers experience as it relates to PTSD, TBI or other just everyday life. The Army fails it's soldiers when high ranking officers are placed in a command position and doesn't wear the patch. You may disagree with me and that's fine but I put 28 years into the military 16 years as an active duty Marine and 12 years as an Officer in the Army and I've seen it all. Females regardless of qualifications based on merit still do not belong in front line infantry units, the Marine Corps proved this point through field exercises involving mixed units pitted against an all male unit! Tge results bear out the facts mixed unit performed poorly as compared to all male units!!!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Teresa Walker
22
22
0
I feel like that is morally wrong. It does not shock me though. It's right up there with affirmative action. It seems everybody wants equality and that's a good thing. But what makes one equal if the receive an action to fill a quota and not because they deserve it. That is NOT equality that is privileged. If my society had the moral fiber I think it once had, those women would find out it it was their qualifications, or if they were filling s quota. And TURN DOWN the position. How could their be any honor in your leadership decisions KNOWING that ANYONE who deserved it got bumped to the side to appease a quota?????? I could not take it. It saddens and hurts me to even hear of this!!!
(22)
Comment
(0)
SFC James Lahtonen
SFC James Lahtonen
>1 y
That IS affirmative action. Now that we have women in all jobs, which is no their right, when will our government change the rules for Selective Service registration? Equality is equality on both sides of the sword. Young women now should have to register for the Selective Service within 90 days of their 18th birthday. The bigger picture that most people forget is that Financial Aid for post secondary education is tied to the Selective Service registration. So how is a young male equal, when if he does not register, he gets no Federal financial aid but young females can continue to draw without the commitment to the Selective Service?
(2)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Brian Anderson
MAJ Brian Anderson
8 y
I am soooo grateful for my precious DD 214.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Ben Almandres
SSG Ben Almandres
8 y
Leadership is Earned and Not Given Just Because! This is not an Election Process, but a Carefully Selection of those who Can Perform and are Qualified to be in that Leadership Position. Now that's Equality
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Instructor
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Seid Waddell
19
19
0
PC is a corrosive and corrupting influence. There is no good reason to select leaders on any other than performance basis.
(19)
Comment
(0)
COL John Power
COL John Power
8 y
Well said. I can't imagine it would be any other way.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
How do you feel about the Army directing units to place new female Armor and Infantry officers in leadership positions ahead of males?
SFC (Other / Not listed)
14
14
0
I thought the whole purpose of this was to allow women to have an EQUAL chance as their male peers. Instead this looks like a bad case of "Promote Ahead of Peers".
(14)
Comment
(0)
SPC Jenna Bisenius
SPC Jenna Bisenius
>1 y
I so agree!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
9
9
0
It will all be ok. The Sergeants run the military anyway.
(9)
Comment
(0)
CSM Richard StCyr
CSM Richard StCyr
>1 y
So true Keith, so true.
(2)
Reply
(0)
COL William Oseles
COL William Oseles
8 y
And what will the Sergeants say when it happens to them?
Will it be ok then when a Sergeant who has been working hard for a Platoon Sergeant or Squad Leader position is told 'Sorry, we could not give you that position because the next three have to be female'?.
Or when a young specialist is told 'You are the best specialist we have BUT We did not select you for E-5 because we have to meet a quota.'
If you think that will not happen you are not in the real world.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Infantryman (Airborne)
SGT (Join to see)
8 y
COL William Oseles, I realize it could happen, and might happen, but what are those Sergeants going to do? Quit? Protest? Nothing?
I vote nothing. This happens all the time in the civilian business world, and in the Military. You just have to suck it up and continue doing a good job. It happened to me in civilian life. I sucked it up and waited for my turn. Within two months, the person who received the Manager position, decided it wasn't his cup of tea, and I got the promotion. Becoming in charge, is more than a title. It has to be done correctly and daily. Even then, you might get burned out. IMHO
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Robert Schatteles
SFC Robert Schatteles
8 y
Your right Col we do nothing, but keep going on with the mission, The Army has (unofficially) been doing Quota's for years at the DA board level, or it's been very coincidental. But hey that's life.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CAPT Kevin B.
8
8
0
It's normal for this type of action in that priming the pump gets the system through the pain in shorter time. Same happens when they want to find homes for designators who become instantly obsolete (A-6 Bombardiers), overstrength on line officers, etc. So you wind up with some spectacular failures, some getting people needlessly killed, most so-so but life goes on, and spectacular successes. In other words, a new bell curve imposed off center on the old one to create a new normal. So the real question is do you slow go it, fast track, or paced? They tend to go north of paced so the implementing brass can take credit for following orders and stroking the system for their next promotion.
(8)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC George Smith
7
7
0
Interesting... How about they go through every phase of training Like every one else and work their way UP... Like every one else...
(7)
Comment
(0)
SPC Jenna Bisenius
SPC Jenna Bisenius
>1 y
Damn skippy!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
ENS Ansi Officer
6
6
0
When our leadership starts viewing us as "Soldiers" and not "Male/Female Soldiers" this crap will stop. Yes, perhaps we can take a more direct look at the gear requirements for both women AND men, as our body structures are different and have changed over the decades. However, placing someone AHEAD of anyone based solely on their gender is ridiculous and the exact opposite of Equal Opportunity. It was like what the Navy was doing in 2012. They were accepting females over males because of the "need". Let's get something straight - there is no NEED for any specific gender in the military - there is only a NEED to fulfill certain billet requirements.. The military should NEVER be about gender - rather about a qualified person fulfilling the role and meeting the requirements for that role..
(6)
Comment
(0)
SPC Jenna Bisenius
SPC Jenna Bisenius
>1 y
Hear, hear!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Self Employed
6
6
0
Edited >1 y ago
If this is true, we will have Women who need more experience being put in Leadership postions because of Female Affirmative Action yet even if they beat the 'good ole boy network' (which does exist) it may endanger both the PL and the platoon's lives.

I am not misogynist being that I am MP enlisted and Officer so seeing females is normal even before the changes. I just think they need to be selected by their experience and potiential not just because they are breathing and female.

There are kick ass females out there and I have worked with them in the past. I just feel sorry for them because if they are in another Desert Shield situation where they have no bath for 2 months and they are at the FLOT wearing the same 2 or 3 uniforms in 120 degree weather, they will have the worst yeast infection and hopefully be mission capable.
Sgt Kelli Mays SGT Tim Soyars SGT (Join to see) SGT Robert George SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth SSG Warren Swan SSG James J. Palmer IV aka "JP4" SSG(P) Chris Erickson CPT Pedro Meza CPT Jack Durish CPT L S SGM (Join to see) SGM Erik Marquez TSgt Melissa Post MAJ Thomas Jones COL John Cole
COL Mikel J. Burroughs SPC Jenna Bisenius Col (Join to see)
SPC Elijah J. Henry, MBA
(6)
Comment
(0)
LTC Self Employed
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
SGT Tim Soyars - so being in combat arms and having no hygiene..what is the 2nd and 3rd order of effects with no baby wipes, no massengil in a hot environment for weeks? What will a female do?
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SSG Warren Swan
>1 y
Col (Join to see) - Sir weren't you a LTC a little while ago? If so congrats. On the women front, yes we should go ahead and put the best forward, BUT give certain commands, certain command teams, and lower leaders, the chance would never come. The male "good ol boy network" would prevent them from ever getting a chance. So what is worse; giving them the chance to succeed or fail, or just using their sex as a means to justify a fail before we even get started. It seems more like the second is what folks want.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Tim Soyars
SGT Tim Soyars
>1 y
I would like to think that, in my prime, I was a pretty formidable force. While working as a LEO, fight fighter, paramedic, and ER nurse over the last 30 some years, I have met some women that could kick most of our collective asses. Some of them, especially in the Fire Service, had to fight their way into the door and up in rank by being tougher and better at their job that the guys. Robyn Benincasa, one of the worlds top adventure racers and probably one of the toughest people I know, is a Captain with the San Dieago Fire Department who happens to have an all female crew on her station. The can stand to the best of any other in the department. It was a hard road, but they do the job that, if they fail, somebody dies. We know how that work. If you are going to put them in the position, train them. Give them the knowledge and experience to do the job. Give them NCOs that will help them just like they did the last twenty shave tail butter bars. If not, the person who decided to put them in that position better be willing to walk up to that door and explain to that mother why her son or daughter died.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC Self Employed
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
SGT Tim Soyars - My Cousin became a firefighter,20 or so yearsa go as one of the first in the San Francisco area. She passed the Academy. She now works for the Red Cross.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Michael Greene
6
6
0
CW2 (Join to see) Source, please? I can't find anything on the 'net about this.
(6)
Comment
(0)
CPT Jim Schwebach
CPT Jim Schwebach
>1 y
My initial thought exactly. This sounds like something "they" said.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Capt Michael Greene
Capt Michael Greene
>1 y
CW2 (Join to see) Second time I'm asking for you to support your statement that "Units are being told to select new female armor and infantry officers for platoon leader positions ahead of their male counterparts." You've received lots of upvotes and many people have bad-mouthed the "policy" that you say exists. But unless you can show us some proof, it would appear you're spreading damaging rumors.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close