Posted on Sep 11, 2021
Learn About the Fight for Scottish Independence
4.13K
56
13
15
15
0
On September 11, 1297, at the Battle of Stirling Bridge, Scottish rebel forces led by William Wallace defeated the English. From the article:
"On September 11, 1297, Surrey's English and Welsh archers crossed the narrow bridge but were recalled as the earl had overslept. Later in the day, Surrey's infantry and cavalry began crossing the bridge. Watching this, Wallace and Moray restrained their troops until a sizable, but beatable, English force had reached the north shore. When approximately 5,400 had crossed the bridge, the Scots attacked and swiftly encircled the English, gaining control of the north end of the bridge. Among those who were trapped on the north shore was Cressingham who was killed and butchered by the Scottish troops.
Unable to send sizable reinforcements across the narrow bridge, Surrey was forced to watch his entire vanguard be destroyed by Wallace and Moray's men. One English knight, Sir Marmaduke Tweng, managed to fight his way back across the bridge to the English lines. Others discarded their armor and attempted to swim back across the River Forth. Despite still having a strong force, Surrey's confidence was destroyed and he ordered the bridge destroyed before retreating south to Berwick.
Seeing Wallace's victory, the Earl of Lennox and James Stewart, the High Steward of Scotland, who been supporting the English, withdrew with their men and joined the Scottish ranks. As Surrey pulled back, Stewart successfully attacked the English supply train, hastening their retreat. By departing the area, Surrey abandoned the English garrison at Stirling Castle, which eventually surrendered to the Scots."
"On September 11, 1297, Surrey's English and Welsh archers crossed the narrow bridge but were recalled as the earl had overslept. Later in the day, Surrey's infantry and cavalry began crossing the bridge. Watching this, Wallace and Moray restrained their troops until a sizable, but beatable, English force had reached the north shore. When approximately 5,400 had crossed the bridge, the Scots attacked and swiftly encircled the English, gaining control of the north end of the bridge. Among those who were trapped on the north shore was Cressingham who was killed and butchered by the Scottish troops.
Unable to send sizable reinforcements across the narrow bridge, Surrey was forced to watch his entire vanguard be destroyed by Wallace and Moray's men. One English knight, Sir Marmaduke Tweng, managed to fight his way back across the bridge to the English lines. Others discarded their armor and attempted to swim back across the River Forth. Despite still having a strong force, Surrey's confidence was destroyed and he ordered the bridge destroyed before retreating south to Berwick.
Seeing Wallace's victory, the Earl of Lennox and James Stewart, the High Steward of Scotland, who been supporting the English, withdrew with their men and joined the Scottish ranks. As Surrey pulled back, Stewart successfully attacked the English supply train, hastening their retreat. By departing the area, Surrey abandoned the English garrison at Stirling Castle, which eventually surrendered to the Scots."
Learn About the Fight for Scottish Independence
Posted from thoughtco.com
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 7
Posted 3 y ago
Great history share SGT (Join to see) ... as a Scottish descendant, I have an affinity for the Scots like William Wallace who fought against tyranny & for Freedom..!
(5)
Comment
(0)
CWO3 (Join to see)
3 y
MY GF McIntosh married a McNutt. Welcome to both McLeod and Inch. This is a different Inch but same fighting spirit. They turned this one into an event. Maybe something similar would resolve some of our differences in USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_North_Inch
(1)
Reply
(0)
Posted 3 y ago
For every Stirling there was a Falkirk, and finally Bannockburn. Nice share.
(5)
Comment
(0)
(5)
Reply
(0)
CWO3 (Join to see)
3 y
CSM Charles Hayden - I should add Culloden to make the Brits feel safer. We'll leave Glencoe out of it re: Campbell Clan.
(5)
Reply
(0)
Read This Next