Avatar feed
Responses: 4
Sgt Commander, Dav Chapter #90
6
6
0
To me this indicates a lessening of communication and an increase in chaos on the battlefield! What say you Army folks?
(6)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
2 y
I would tend to agree with you.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSG Signal Support Systems Specialist
MSG (Join to see)
2 y
It can. I've got some ideas on reducing the number of radios and maintaining correct levels of comms.
Establish a standard PACE. (With some flexibility)
Implement multi-mode RETRANS (global reach and less danger for the operators)
Train and empower 25Us to make field repairs instead of diagnose and replace.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG Thomas Currie
MSG Thomas Currie
2 y
Absolutely a lessening of communications because the ground forces cannot afford the money to have secure communications gear down to the levels needed AND a severe lessening of security because soldiers are going to do the same things that the Russians have been doing -- they are going to bring or get unauthorized communications gear and use it to meet their short-range communications needs.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Joseph Kopac
4
4
0
Oh no ! They gonna trash my old PRC-25 ?
(4)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
2 y
Good riddance!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Trent Klug
1
1
0
It's about time. This has been a necessary change for the last 20 plus years. There were times as a squad leader where our Radio Shack ear radio and Mike worked better and had farther range than our Army issue squad radios.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
2 y
That's been the case for going on 40 years!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close