4
4
0
Trump ordered to muffle stump speech: Courtroom cameo previews next dramatic campaign stage.
MY SAY: Where is the humanity? Where is the justice? Why isn't there anyone with common sense checking and balancing this pathetic circus? There is no crime here except the weaponization of the justice system against a political opponent of the ruling party.
MY SAY: Where is the humanity? Where is the justice? Why isn't there anyone with common sense checking and balancing this pathetic circus? There is no crime here except the weaponization of the justice system against a political opponent of the ruling party.
Trump ordered to muffle stump speech
Posted from washingtontimes-dc.newsmemory.com
Donald Trump
Justice
Election 2024
Fairness
Posted 1 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
2
2
0
This is a legitimate case, following New York law!
Trying to make Trump a victim is laughable.
Trying to make Trump a victim is laughable.
(2)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MAJ Montgomery Granger - Please show any evidence you may possess of the corruption of the DA and AG.
BTW, here is the law.
I'll let you see if it has ever been enforced.
New York Executive Law § 63(12), sometimes called simply "63 12", is a New York law that gives the Attorney General of New York broad powers to investigate and prosecute cases of civil fraud. Due to its broad definitions, section 63(12) provides the AG with far-reaching powers to issue subpoenas, as well as low legal hurdles to do so. The law was passed in 1956, while Jacob Javits was attorney general
BTW, here is the law.
I'll let you see if it has ever been enforced.
New York Executive Law § 63(12), sometimes called simply "63 12", is a New York law that gives the Attorney General of New York broad powers to investigate and prosecute cases of civil fraud. Due to its broad definitions, section 63(12) provides the AG with far-reaching powers to issue subpoenas, as well as low legal hurdles to do so. The law was passed in 1956, while Jacob Javits was attorney general
(1)
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
Isn't there also a law against jaywalking? It's all about priorities. Letitia James campaigned on making Donald Trump - not the citizens of New York - a priority. Crime has skyrocketed since she took charge, and she appears ambivalent. With regard to Trump's case, there are no victims. There is no offense. There is only innuendo, accusation and myths. "Guilty until proven innocent," disdain for equal protection under the law and due process prevail. And that's CORRUPT and wrong. Not to mention targeted "justice" and campaign interference. Soros is behind it all.
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MAJ Montgomery Granger - According to most conservatives, Soros is behind every anti-conservative action around the world.
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MAJ Montgomery Granger - Trump violated a law. He was tried and found liable for the fraud. No person is above the law. He should pay.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
He's already been found liable for fraud so I'm not sure why he's putting on the theatrics right now. Also if anyone else talked to a judge the way he has, they'd be held in contempt. So he should enjoy his privilege. Also he thought he was still President in 2021...so...and didn't Eric pretty much lie under oath and it was shown with his emails that he lied?
I don't understand why you people STILL defend him and his criminal children. "Where is the humanity?" Are you kidding me? LOL he's getting away with a LOT that any other person wouldn't. I don't understand why you guys give him so many passes and you treat him like he's a god. It's disturbing.
I don't understand why you people STILL defend him and his criminal children. "Where is the humanity?" Are you kidding me? LOL he's getting away with a LOT that any other person wouldn't. I don't understand why you guys give him so many passes and you treat him like he's a god. It's disturbing.
(1)
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
What's disturbing is the weaponization of the American Justice System. How can a person who campaigned on targeting a private citizen be allowed to pursue "trumped up" charges with no victim, no crime, and no proof?
(0)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MAJ Montgomery Granger - There is NO weaponization of our justice system. \
Trump violated the law. Period. The court has the proof.
As a foot note, when this first went to trail, the defense chose to not request a jury. Bad move.
Again, the law:
New York Executive Law § 63(12), sometimes called simply "63 12", is a New York law that gives the Attorney General of New York broad powers to investigate and prosecute cases of civil fraud. Due to its broad definitions, section 63(12) provides the AG with far-reaching powers to issue subpoenas, as well as low legal hurdles to do so. The law was passed in 1956, while Jacob Javits was attorney general
Trump violated the law. Period. The court has the proof.
As a foot note, when this first went to trail, the defense chose to not request a jury. Bad move.
Again, the law:
New York Executive Law § 63(12), sometimes called simply "63 12", is a New York law that gives the Attorney General of New York broad powers to investigate and prosecute cases of civil fraud. Due to its broad definitions, section 63(12) provides the AG with far-reaching powers to issue subpoenas, as well as low legal hurdles to do so. The law was passed in 1956, while Jacob Javits was attorney general
(0)
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
Isn't jaywalking against the law? It's all about priorities. Donald Trump is the biggest threat to the corrupt DemonRat Party, plain and simple. They targeted him before he was even sworn into office, and this is more of the same. There are no victims here. Violent crime runs rampant on the streets and the number one law enforcement officer sits in a courtroom to scoff at a non-criminal she hates. Bias, prejudice, targeting, unequal justice, "guilty until proven innocent," it's all a ruse, all a front for corrupt Soros & Co. They can't stand Trump because he speaks the truth and puts people over profit.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google