Posted on Oct 24, 2023
‘Profound Implications’ for Free Speech: Supreme Court to Review Ban on White House Contact With...
763
9
7
5
5
0
Posted in these groups: 
Supreme Court
1st Amendment
Supreme Court 1st Amendment
Posted 1 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
If the Supreme Court rules for the administration, then the Constitution as it. stands is dead and we are no longer a Republic.
When our government can squash speech it doesn't like, which the First Amendment is supposed to protect, we have become a totalitarian government and none of the Bill of Rights is worth a damn.
When our government can squash speech it doesn't like, which the First Amendment is supposed to protect, we have become a totalitarian government and none of the Bill of Rights is worth a damn.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
In its Oct. 20 ruling, the Supreme Court also temporarily lifted restrictions on the White House’s contact with tech firms by preventing enforcement of the lower court’s injunction, first granted July 4 by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana Monroe Division.
The injunction applied to the White House, the surgeon general, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the FBI and, as of an Oct. 3 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, barring them from communicating with social media companies about “misinformation.”
The injunction applied to the White House, the surgeon general, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the FBI and, as of an Oct. 3 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, barring them from communicating with social media companies about “misinformation.”
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
Children’s Health Defense - Bias and Credibility
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudosciencecategorymaypublish unverifiable information that isnot alwayssupported by evidence.
(0)
(0)
LTC David Brown
What does that have to do with the case at hand? The case is clearly being heard before the Supreme Court and analysis of what is going on is legitimate. It isn’t like 51 intelligence “experts”, with out ever analyzing Hunter’s lap top, state it looks like Russian disinformation.
(1)
(0)
MAJ Dale E. Wilson, Ph.D.
The problem, as I see it, is that the left sees every contrary opinion as unsupportable by even hard evidence. Just ask Rashida Tlaib . . .
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google