Avatar feed
Responses: 3
MSgt Dale Johnson
3
3
0
Sounds like maybe mismanagement of funds or something to me, article stated as of a few weeks ago the Swedish Company was giving positive remarks on the project.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Casey O'Mally
SFC Casey O'Mally
1 y
Article says MURPHY said they were giving positive statements a few weeks back. But the COMPANY was citing supply chain issues a couple months back, and signaling doubt about viability.

Typical political ostrich refusing to pay attention because it would be damaging to his taxpayer funded propaganda scheme.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Dale Johnson
MSgt Dale Johnson
1 y
SFC Casey O'Mally I reread, you are correct.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Marc King
3
3
0
A minor victory for the people of New Jersey
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Trent Klug
2
2
0
Isn't it weird how having more power generation capacity means higher costs for the rate payer? Hmm...I was told by the greenies that more power generation and capacity would translate into lower rates.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close