Avatar feed
Responses: 6
Capt Tom Brown
2
2
0
We might have done better if more of those 500k+ troops were actually in the field fighting the crafty cong instead of in the rear with the gear at the various 'command' headquarters walking around in starched jungle uniforms and spit-shined boots. I understand we had a tremendous logistical tail in RVN.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 y
That has been a common complaint since Washington's army,, and probably before.

I was at MACV during this time frame. Yes, we had a tremendous "logistical tail" but those out in the field cannot fight without that "tail." Bullets and beans are as essential to the war effort as the man in the field, for he cannot fight "the crafty cong" without them. In my case it was intel analysis on opposing forces strength versus our strength.

Also, it was not necessarily safe to be at one of those command centers. Remember, there were no front lines in that war. Every place a US troop set down his "spit-shinned boots" was a "front." While, fortunately, I had no KIA's in my section (17 men scattered around the country) I did have 3 WIA's, two MEDIVACED for "non-hostile" injuries, and a number of troops suffering from various forms of disease found in that lovely paradise. Add to that the insidious exposure to Agent Orange, no place was safe in Viet Nam.
So, all accolades to the troop out in the jungle, but never slight the ones supporting him.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Randy Wilber
2
2
0
Thanks for sharing history of the war SP5 Mark Kuzinski
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SP5 Mark Kuzinski
2
2
0
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close