Posted on Dec 10, 2024
'Death to Jews': Inside the Home of 2 SJP Leaders at George Mason University, Police Find Guns,...
251
22
3
11
11
0
The students were targeted, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), for engaging in "anti-genocide events on campus." The Intercept reported that police found "antique firearms" registered to the students' brother and brought gun-related charges as a result of his family's "pro-Palestine activism."
Excluded from those descriptions was the crime the sisters are suspected of committing. A group of student radicals defaced George Mason’s student center in August, spray painting messages that warned of a "student intifada." In its coverage of the incident, the Washington Post wrote that "activists spray-painted words on Wilkins Plaza outside the university’s Johnson Center."
Those activists caused thousands of dollars in damage, a felony in the state of Virginia, and police suspect the SJP leaders, sisters Jena and Noor Chanaa, led the group of vandals. Weeks after the incident, in November, a county judge granted a warrant—which is under seal until February, according to a Fairfax County court representative—allowing police to seize electronics from the Chanaa family home.
When officers entered the Chanaa family home, they found firearms—modern weapons, not antiques—as well as scores of ammunition and foreign passports, all of which sat in plain view, according to court documents obtained by the Free Beacon and sources familiar with the investigation.
Excluded from those descriptions was the crime the sisters are suspected of committing. A group of student radicals defaced George Mason’s student center in August, spray painting messages that warned of a "student intifada." In its coverage of the incident, the Washington Post wrote that "activists spray-painted words on Wilkins Plaza outside the university’s Johnson Center."
Those activists caused thousands of dollars in damage, a felony in the state of Virginia, and police suspect the SJP leaders, sisters Jena and Noor Chanaa, led the group of vandals. Weeks after the incident, in November, a county judge granted a warrant—which is under seal until February, according to a Fairfax County court representative—allowing police to seize electronics from the Chanaa family home.
When officers entered the Chanaa family home, they found firearms—modern weapons, not antiques—as well as scores of ammunition and foreign passports, all of which sat in plain view, according to court documents obtained by the Free Beacon and sources familiar with the investigation.
'Death to Jews': Inside the Home of 2 SJP Leaders at George Mason University, Police Find Guns,...
Posted from freebeacon.com
George Mason University
Terrorism
Weapons
Posted 5 d ago
Responses: 3
7
7
0
When found guilty, terminate their status as Students, expelled them from the University, Deport them, and bar them from ever red entering the US.
(7)
(0)
2
2
0
If CAIR, a hamas support group, says they were unfairly targeted, I say target them some more.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
The case involving sisters Jena and Noor Chanaa at George Mason University has garnered significant attention due to the intersection of political activism, alleged vandalism, and legal repercussions. Here's a detailed breakdown:
Alleged Vandalism and Charges:
The incident in question took place in August when student activists, reportedly including the Chanaa sisters, defaced George Mason's student center with graffiti promoting a "student intifada." This act of vandalism caused thousands of dollars in damage, which under Virginia law, constitutes a felony.
Following this, the police investigation led to the sisters being suspected of leading the group responsible for the vandalism, although specific charges directly related to the vandalism have not been clearly reported in the immediate aftermath.
Police Actions and Discoveries:
In November, a search warrant was executed at the Chanaa family home, leading to the discovery of modern firearms, ammunition, and foreign passports. This contradicts earlier claims of finding only "antique firearms" registered to their brother. These items were reportedly in plain view, suggesting a possible basis for additional charges beyond those directly related to vandalism.
Legal Context and Founding Fathers' Views on Islam:
Regarding the historical context of laws concerning Muslims, the founding fathers of the United States did not explicitly legislate about Muslims but established principles of religious freedom that would include them. The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, drafted by Thomas Jefferson and enacted in 1786, is a seminal document that influenced the First Amendment. It explicitly aimed to provide religious liberty to "the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan [Muslim], the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination," indicating an inclusive view of religious freedom that would extend to Muslims.
This statute, along with other founding documents, reflects the founders' intent to create a nation where no religious test would be required for public office or citizenship, which implicitly included Muslims in the American fabric of religious tolerance.
Public and Advocacy Responses:
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and reports like those from The Intercept have framed the police actions as targeting the students for their political activism, specifically their involvement in anti-genocide events. This narrative suggests a concern over civil liberties and freedom of expression being used as pretexts for legal action.
However, the presence of modern firearms and other materials found during the search might complicate this narrative, suggesting that the legal actions could also be based on violations of firearm laws or other criminal activities unrelated to political expression.
Current State of Affairs:
The specifics of the legal charges against the Chanaa sisters, especially in relation to the vandalism, remain under seal until February, which adds a layer of complexity to understanding the full scope of the legal issues they face.
This situation illustrates the challenges of balancing free speech, political activism, and legal accountability, especially when intertwined with broader societal issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It also highlights how historical principles of religious freedom established by the founding fathers are interpreted and applied in modern contexts, particularly when involving minority religious groups in political activism.
Alleged Vandalism and Charges:
The incident in question took place in August when student activists, reportedly including the Chanaa sisters, defaced George Mason's student center with graffiti promoting a "student intifada." This act of vandalism caused thousands of dollars in damage, which under Virginia law, constitutes a felony.
Following this, the police investigation led to the sisters being suspected of leading the group responsible for the vandalism, although specific charges directly related to the vandalism have not been clearly reported in the immediate aftermath.
Police Actions and Discoveries:
In November, a search warrant was executed at the Chanaa family home, leading to the discovery of modern firearms, ammunition, and foreign passports. This contradicts earlier claims of finding only "antique firearms" registered to their brother. These items were reportedly in plain view, suggesting a possible basis for additional charges beyond those directly related to vandalism.
Legal Context and Founding Fathers' Views on Islam:
Regarding the historical context of laws concerning Muslims, the founding fathers of the United States did not explicitly legislate about Muslims but established principles of religious freedom that would include them. The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, drafted by Thomas Jefferson and enacted in 1786, is a seminal document that influenced the First Amendment. It explicitly aimed to provide religious liberty to "the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan [Muslim], the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination," indicating an inclusive view of religious freedom that would extend to Muslims.
This statute, along with other founding documents, reflects the founders' intent to create a nation where no religious test would be required for public office or citizenship, which implicitly included Muslims in the American fabric of religious tolerance.
Public and Advocacy Responses:
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and reports like those from The Intercept have framed the police actions as targeting the students for their political activism, specifically their involvement in anti-genocide events. This narrative suggests a concern over civil liberties and freedom of expression being used as pretexts for legal action.
However, the presence of modern firearms and other materials found during the search might complicate this narrative, suggesting that the legal actions could also be based on violations of firearm laws or other criminal activities unrelated to political expression.
Current State of Affairs:
The specifics of the legal charges against the Chanaa sisters, especially in relation to the vandalism, remain under seal until February, which adds a layer of complexity to understanding the full scope of the legal issues they face.
This situation illustrates the challenges of balancing free speech, political activism, and legal accountability, especially when intertwined with broader societal issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It also highlights how historical principles of religious freedom established by the founding fathers are interpreted and applied in modern contexts, particularly when involving minority religious groups in political activism.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google