What is at stake in Ukraine

LTC (Join to see) - MAJ Ken Landgren While I disagree with General Keane's opinion about Biden/Putin, I do think we could have done more with the Polish MIG's and heavier armaments including the stated helicopter. I am not unconvinced that when push comes to shove Putin will use the nuclear option, he has nothing to lose since his life will most likely be forfeit if his internal security apparatus sees him as a loser.

Poland was willing to give Ukraine fighters but then the country wanted our fighters. That was the no-go.

MAJ Ken Landgren still, Australia and the UK are giving armored vehicles to Ukraine. The UK prime minister was there last week.

Notice that we are not seeing any Legacy Russian main battle tanks and fighter jets? I know Slovakia was giving an S-300 missile system and that is helpful.

I am concerned that Ukraine will lose the war in the long run because Russia keeps hitting all the logistics infrastructure

PO2 Marco Monsalve in the Cold War, Stalin did not use nuclear weapons. Khrushchev had nuclear weapons in Cuba and he had his local commanders have the ability to fire if they lost contact. Brezhnev other Russian leaders did not use nuclear weapons during the Vietnam war.

If we have Democratic president like Bill Clinton or j.f.k., this would not be a problem. We would send them Legacy Russian tanks, armored personnel carriers and aircraft that they already know how to use.

I am concerned that without heavy weaponry, Ukraine will eventually have too much attrition and lose the war. I think the only reason President Biden is more helpful is because he is being upstaged by the prime ministers of Australia oh, England and Slovakia actually giving them offense of weaponry like armored cars and s-300 missile systems.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10697737/Russia-Ukraine-crisis-Australia-sends-20-Bushmaster-military-vehicles-Ukraine.html
MAJ Ken Landgren CWO4 Terrence Clark PO2 Marco Monsalve