Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SFC Stephen King
4
4
0
Thank you, for the share SGT (Join to see)
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Harvey K.
3
3
0
They are still stupid enough to try stretching a disorderly demonstration that led to some riotous behavior into an "insurrection", where the only shot fired killed an unarmed woman demonstrator.
They have leaned too far to the left, and fell off the ladder.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Harvey K.
CW3 Harvey K.
>1 y
SFC (Verify To See) - "Weird since 11 people have been charged with seditious conspiracy for their actions on Jan 6."

What's "weird" is your assumption of guilt before trial, in spite of the invitation by guards for demonstrators to enter the Capitol, the only shot fired was by a government agent to kill an unarmed woman demonstrator, and the growing public realization that the "molehill to mountain" attempt by Democrat-Socialists to manufacture an "insurrection" is the mirror image of the claims that the riots, arson, declaration of an "autonomous zone" etc. was just a "mostly peaceful" protest.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW3 Harvey K.
CW3 Harvey K.
>1 y
Ah, but THIS "insurrection" did "involve guns". An unarmed woman was shot to death by a government agent, so "potato" yourself.
If "enough evidence to charge" is enough to convict then why bother with a trial? Just a waste of time.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Self Employed
2
2
0
They're not liberals, they're leftists.
And of course they'll decide what "insurrectionist" means so they can decide who goes on the ballot.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Self Employed
Sgt (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - Well, if you're going to use those definitions, any two people who resist arrest for shoplifting are guilty of seditious conspiracy.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close