Adam Schiff Gets Caught Doctoring January 6th Text Messages, Exposes His Imbecility in the...

Well I tried ABC & CBS. They're silent. NBC, MSNBC and NPR touched on it in their usual manner, but of course we both know the weight they have.

CWO4 Terrence Clark - Terry, put your bias to the side and look for good sources first, then put your bias glasses back on and address it then. You can use the facts from good sources and still come to a conclusion that is different than others.

I could post from a website "news" source that condemns Trump for the repeated violent rape of a 13-year-old, but I don't, because the reliable news sources don't support that. I'll comment on the facts that are supported in those reliable sources, but I won't go past that into the realm of propaganda and make-believe.

What's your purpose here? The truth, opinion based on sourced facts, and an honest discourse? Or using propaganda to support your candidate and party over everything else?

Capt Gregory Prickett
There was a process between myself and the unions with whom I dealt. When arbitration was invoked we "struck" arbitrators. You may have engaged in such yourself. Perhaps we could "strike" sources. I'm interested in reliable sources. And how reliablity is decided.

CWO4 Terrence Clark - In my practice, I don't deal much with arbitrators, I mainly deal with mediators, who operate much differently. I stick to the mainstream sources for the most part.

As far as sources? I use this chart primarily. I prefer using sources that are above the green line for factual reporting, and are more towards the center. If I have to go outside that, I'll stay within the "skews" right/left boxes, and above the FoxNewsWeb-Reason-MSNBCTV line. Epoch Times and Occupy Democrats are on the same level, so I don't use either.