Posted on Nov 9, 2021
U.S. tells court that blocking COVID-19 vaccine rule to cost lives
1.21K
29
7
9
9
0
Edited 3 y ago
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 3
SFC (Join to see)
Don't hold your breath. They didn't hear basic law in Pa.: Republican legislators and the Pennsylvania Republican Party went to the Supreme Court in late September, asking the justices to put the state court’s ruling on hold. They contended that the part of the ruling allowing ballots to be counted when the postmarks were not clear would lead to the counting of ballots sent after Election Day, in violation of federal election law and the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in an order issued before Barrett’s confirmation, deadlocked on the request, leaving the state supreme court’s decision in place. Four justices – Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – indicated that they would have granted the Republicans’ application.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/justices-add-new-cases-turn-down-pennsylvania-election-disputes/
https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/02/justices-add-new-cases-turn-down-pennsylvania-election-disputes/
Justices add new cases, turn down Pennsylvania election disputes - SCOTUSblog
The justices on Monday issued their first regularly scheduled order list since late January. Perhaps the most noteworthy part of the orders was the justices’ denial of former President Donald Trump’s plea to block a subpoena for his financial records, but the order list was significant in other resp
(1)
(0)
As I recall, the Judiciary blocked many of Trumps initiatives, no big surprise here.
(4)
(0)
CWO4 Terrence Clark
MCPO Roger Collins
Yep. Its the nature if the executive to push boundaries. Judicial to bright line them.
Yep. Its the nature if the executive to push boundaries. Judicial to bright line them.
(1)
(0)
(1)
(0)
Read This Next