Avatar feed
Responses: 5
LTC Stephen C.
6
6
0
Edited 4 y ago
She’s completely uninformed, from every perspective, SGT (Join to see)!
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Robert Webster
4
4
0
How did the author come up with this nonsense:
"Really, the Second Amendment was not meant for assault weapons. Bear in mind that “arms” also means bombs, rockets, bazookas and machine guns, to name a few. Perhaps the issue for the assault rifle proponents is to possess all that power."
(4)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Harvey K.
CW3 Harvey K.
4 y
Talk about "conflation". We are first told that the principle of the 2nd Amendment regarding the right of the ordinary citizen to be armed with the same sort of infantry rifle as a modern soldier was not intended (I suppose MILLER 1939 should be thrown out in its entirety).
Then we are presented with a litany of other weapons, the possession of which is a power reserved for the government, but coveted by "assault rifle proponents". Quite a leap.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Harvey K.
3
3
0
Edited 4 y ago
By her own expressed principles on the 2nd Amendment, she should be limited in publishing her 1st Amendment protected opinion to the communication technology of 1791. That would be the megaphone or the hand-operated printing press.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG Robert Webster
4 y
CW3 Harvey K. That's good. ;-)
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close