Posted on Feb 5, 2020
13
13
0
She along with other RepubliCONS have said what he has done is wrong and immoral, yet still chooses to acquit. The Anti Constitution Party is corrupt
Susan Collins will vote to acquit Trump despite 'wrong' behavior
Posted from politico.com
Donald Trump
Ukraine
Republicans
Crime
Constitution
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 20
15
15
0
Something you construe to be wrong does not make it impeachable and does not mean a president should be removed. Not everyone thinks it was wrong either.
Was it wrong when Obama told Medvedev to ask Putin to back off until after the election when Obama would have more flexibility. Yes, it was wrong and far more wrong than anything in the call Trump had with the incoming President of Ukraine.
Removing any president without very real evidence of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors is improper and an attempt to manipulate elections and the electoral process. The democrats are getting their comeuppance today in the Senate.
Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler will have to do the walk of shame back to the house. Their attempt at removing a duly elected president over partisan hatred will fail.
Enjoy the humble pie.
Was it wrong when Obama told Medvedev to ask Putin to back off until after the election when Obama would have more flexibility. Yes, it was wrong and far more wrong than anything in the call Trump had with the incoming President of Ukraine.
Removing any president without very real evidence of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors is improper and an attempt to manipulate elections and the electoral process. The democrats are getting their comeuppance today in the Senate.
Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler will have to do the walk of shame back to the house. Their attempt at removing a duly elected president over partisan hatred will fail.
Enjoy the humble pie.
(15)
(0)
SSG Brian G.
MSG Stan Hutchison - The Mueller report says POSSIBLY. It does not and did not say he did. To obstruct there has to be certain elements. Using executive privilege is not one of them. Did he lie? No. Did he destroy evidence or hide evidence or tell others to do so? No. Did he tell others to lie under oath or suggest it? No. There was no obstruction of justice.
(1)
(0)
SSgt Ray Stone
Lie. You seriously lack reading comprehension, you
learned about politics at fraudulent Trump Univ huh. evidence presented proved quid pro quo. Just because his party of crooks and liars has said that the evidence provided isn't effecient enough to prove the Dems case does not make it true. And as I said in my post Susan along with other Republicans has said asking a foreign gov to investigate a political rival and withholding military aid is WRONG. They were careful not to say illegal which I must admit is smart. Truthfully Repub senators are afraid of condemning Trump due to his cultists and their threat of civil war . Cowards
learned about politics at fraudulent Trump Univ huh. evidence presented proved quid pro quo. Just because his party of crooks and liars has said that the evidence provided isn't effecient enough to prove the Dems case does not make it true. And as I said in my post Susan along with other Republicans has said asking a foreign gov to investigate a political rival and withholding military aid is WRONG. They were careful not to say illegal which I must admit is smart. Truthfully Repub senators are afraid of condemning Trump due to his cultists and their threat of civil war . Cowards
(0)
(1)
(0)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
SSgt Ray Stone - The democrats did not substantiate or charge a quid pro quo/bribe. There was no such charge Ray. You lose again...Something someone may construe as wrong does not make it illegal or a crime. You just cannot accept the fact that the dems had no case and blew it. Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler are the three stooges of the house. That is your reality. They lost big.
(2)
(0)
11
10
1
They say he did nothing wrong...well he hasn't...no proof in the house sham investigations and trials...no illegal actions or for the right term no High Crimes and misdemeanors...no laws broken...all the witnesses said were things like well I believe he might have or I thought I heard...no smoking guns..DemoRATS have done and did the same things but nothing has been done or said when they do it...do as I say not as I do mentality. Nancy Pelosi even stated when she finished the impeachment that it took 2 and a half years to get him but they finally got him when the charges were from a year and a half ago...so they were out to get him the night he was duly elected because they didn't like the outcome and wanted to use bogus information to get him out of office and run the White House from the Congress...they even said that the night he was elected that they were going to impeach...well guess what welcome to four more years because all they did was piss off Americans by not taking care of govt business and wasting all these tax payer dollars chasing ghosts. KAG!!!
Maj Marty Hogan Lt Col Charlie Brown 1stSgt Glenn Brackin
Cpl Craig Morton SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth COL Mikel J. Burroughs
LTC Stephen C. CPL Dave Hoover PO3 Bob McCord
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Sgt Wayne Wood PVT James Strait
SFC Jack Champion MSgt David Hoffman MSgt Stephen Council
SGT Elizabeth Scheck PO1 H Gene Lawrence 1SG Steven Imerman SGT Steve McFarland SSgt Terry P.
Maj Marty Hogan Lt Col Charlie Brown 1stSgt Glenn Brackin
Cpl Craig Morton SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth COL Mikel J. Burroughs
LTC Stephen C. CPL Dave Hoover PO3 Bob McCord
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Sgt Wayne Wood PVT James Strait
SFC Jack Champion MSgt David Hoffman MSgt Stephen Council
SGT Elizabeth Scheck PO1 H Gene Lawrence 1SG Steven Imerman SGT Steve McFarland SSgt Terry P.
(11)
(1)
SSG Robert Webster
MSgt Steve Sweeney - Actually, I do have credentials. Do you?
And as far as PolitiFact being supported by the US Intelligence Community, it is interesting to note that the US Intelligence Community is also a source of propaganda. And how does the US Intelligence Community support The Poynter Institute, PolitiFact, schools and other 'news organizations'?
Propaganda - information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
And as far as PolitiFact being supported by the US Intelligence Community, it is interesting to note that the US Intelligence Community is also a source of propaganda. And how does the US Intelligence Community support The Poynter Institute, PolitiFact, schools and other 'news organizations'?
Propaganda - information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
MSgt Steve Sweeney - "...actively opposing the US Intelligence Community..." ROFLMAO! Your ignorant statement implies that PolitiFact is a member of the US IC; how stupid are you?
You may want to go back to school and take a basic course in English Composition. At most universities that is either English 001 or English 100. Good luck.
You may want to go back to school and take a basic course in English Composition. At most universities that is either English 001 or English 100. Good luck.
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
MSgt Steve Sweeney - I did and that is why I chose it. If you can not figure that out, then either you are uneducated or you are incapable of understanding what is really quite simple.
The statement and the claim is either correct, mixed, or not correct. In this particular case there are only two (2), I repeat only two (2) solutions; it is either correct/true or it is not correct/false. The statement and 'fact check' as presented cannot be mixed, since it has been classified as mixed, then the 'fact check' is an example of spin-doctoring or in more simple terms propaganda.
It appears to be evident that your hatred and loathing of anything to the right of your opinion is blinding you and keeping you (and others) from a rational discussion.
The statement and the claim is either correct, mixed, or not correct. In this particular case there are only two (2), I repeat only two (2) solutions; it is either correct/true or it is not correct/false. The statement and 'fact check' as presented cannot be mixed, since it has been classified as mixed, then the 'fact check' is an example of spin-doctoring or in more simple terms propaganda.
It appears to be evident that your hatred and loathing of anything to the right of your opinion is blinding you and keeping you (and others) from a rational discussion.
(0)
(0)
10
10
0
She gave a great speech pointing out the Lack of Impeachable offenses and the incompetence of the DemocRats to prove their case. Good for Sen Collins!
(10)
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
Sometimes and not often politicians break ranks with their corrupt leadership and use their own brains and vote with their constituents at heart.
(4)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google