Avatar feed
Responses: 11
Cpl Mark A. Morris
4
4
0
The Southern Poverty Law Center is an extremist group. Are they still starting shit, getting heaps of money for said shit, then sending money to the island? Don't want to much taxes you know.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Mark A. Morris
Cpl Mark A. Morris
>1 y
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/sep/1/splc-transferred-millions-offshore-tax-havens/

They use to be how you see them. But, they have become a member of the hate business. Feigning outradge to gather money. Kind of like televangelist needing a new Lear Jet.
Have a good day SPC.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Jamarl Jones
SGT Jamarl Jones
>1 y
The founding fathers were an extremist group.... Jesus and his disciples were an extremist group... That title means nothing....
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark A. Morris
Cpl Mark A. Morris
>1 y
According to the dictionary, you are not correct.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/extremist
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark A. Morris
Cpl Mark A. Morris
>1 y
I agree Sir. It shows motive.
To them, anyone who disagrees with them is called extreme.
On their list of extremists are groups that do not belong on it. But, they are called extreme. Because, they do not parallel the left leaning thought of the Southern Poverty Law Center.
They make Mony off of hate and causing low information voters to get upset and be emotional.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG(P) Photographer/Owner
3
3
0
If they stand on sidewalk, it's public property. Additionally, Oath Keepers are not extremists...the SPLC labeled them as such because they disagree with them.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGT Jamarl Jones
SGT Jamarl Jones
>1 y
Well don't silly things like facts and God-given rights get in the way of oppressing the people.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG(P) Photographer/Owner
SSG(P) (Join to see)
>1 y
What?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SSG Warren Swan
>1 y
"Congress later amended the GFSA and made it a part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (the ESEA), which later became No Child Left Behind (NCLB). These laws made a "zero-tolerance" policy on weapons a requirement to receive federal funding on education. Schools across the nation therefore have strict policies banning weapons from school" It would be a poor choice for them to do this. Feelings may be on their side, but the law isn't.
http://education.findlaw.com/school-safety/school-violence-and-weapons-legislation.html
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SN Greg Wright
3
3
0
Yeah...no on this. Just. No.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SSG Warren Swan
>1 y
Cpl Mark McMiller - I respect your opinion, and have to concede that maybe there are some good men and women in there, but this is a kneejerk reaction. Those never end well, and the best thing they could do in supporting the constitution is let those who are charged with enforcing the laws (not the local Sheriff it seems) do what they're paid to do.
I don't care for the org in the way some have used the name, much the same way with BLM.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
>1 y
SSG Warren Swan - I think that just like any organization the Oath Keepers have some bad apples, but those are a very small minority. Most Oath Keepers are current and former cops and military members. I don't know what type of oath cops take, but the military members vow to uphold the oath they took when they joined the military to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign or domestic. So they aren't necessarily right wing and they aren't necessarily anti-government as long as the government is adhering to the Constitution.
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SSG Warren Swan
>1 y
Cpl Mark McMiller - You're right. The Oath has no expiration date, and I like that. But to add fuel to the fire is only making things worse. I'm not sure if this happened, but were the parents briefed on this, local school administers, the PD, and local legislators? Congress made a law 25yrs ago that said no weapons on school property with a 1000 foot perimeter around it (not a physical barrier). So in doing what they're thinking, they've broken the law the second they show up within those 1000ft. What they could do is offer a non armed security that will coordinate security in the school with radio and video SITREPS to allow the police to clear the building faster.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
>1 y
SSG Warren Swan - Yea, that's the Gun-Free School Zone Act of 1990 that has caused schools to be soft targets for mass shooters. That law has a couple of pertinent exceptions: First, private property that is not part of the school grounds is exempted. Second, individuals who have a carry permit that required law enforcement approval and was issued in the same state where the school is located are exempted.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close