Posted on Feb 12, 2018
Court Overturns Sentence of GI Convicted of Beating Toddler Stepson
5.92K
30
10
9
9
0
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 5
Thanks SGT (Join to see) for sharing the sad news that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ruled that the reprimand of Maj. David Jerkins was not allowable evidence: it was issued after a fraternization charge for the same conduct was dropped days before Jerkins' arraignment, and it hadn't been finalized because Jerkins hadn't yet responded to it.
Even though Maj. David Jerkins was convicted of beating his 3-year-old toddler stepson with a belt. He was a 41-year-old father of nine who'd served 19 years, mostly in the reserves, and had won a leadership award in 2007.
Image: Steve slapping Ranger scroll on Ethan at RIP Graduation - Ranger Memorial, Ft Benning, Ga.
My own U.S. Army Ranger son lost his appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. He was sentenced to 35 years based on testimony which excluded the Article 32 investigation at Fort Benning in 2011. The benighted or somewhat corrupt CG at the time ignored the testimony of the Article 32 and the instructions to the General Court Martial included no prejudicial testimony on the accusers and no accounts of my son's performance of duty while assigned to 3rd BN/75th Rangers on multiple deployments.
"The military's highest court overturned the dismissal of an Army major convicted of beating his toddler stepson, narrowly deciding that a general's reprimand letter improperly influenced the jury.
Maj. David Jerkins was convicted at court-martial in 2014 of assaulting the 3-year-old with a belt. He was a 41-year-old father of nine who'd served 19 years, mostly in the reserves, and had won a leadership award in 2007.
Before he was sentenced to six months in jail and dismissal at Fort Hood, Texas, two Army colonels and two major generals testified to his sterling military qualities and said they'd be proud to continue to serve with him.
Prosecutors seeking to rebut that "good character" evidence were allowed by the judge to show the jury Jerkins' recently-issued reprimand letter.
Issued by the commander of 1st Army Division West, the reprimand was for Jerkins' fraternization with an enlisted soldier. Jerkins and the soldier, the toddler's mother, were married in 2011. Shortly afterwards she became pregnant and left the service.
The reprimand stated that Jerkins had discredited himself and the Army and that it was doubtful he was fit for further service.
The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ruled that the reprimand was not allowable evidence: it was issued after a fraternization charge for the same conduct was dropped days before Jerkins' arraignment, and it hadn't been finalized because Jerkins hadn't yet responded to it.
As a result, "the "commander's opinion that (Jerkins) was unfit for continued military service -- essentially, a recommendation that he be dismissed from the service -- invaded the province of the members of the court-martial," according to the opinion issued Thursday.
The justices split three to two deciding whether the judge's error was "harmless" or instead made a difference in the jury's sentencing decision.
The two dissenting justices wrote in their opinion that the reprimand was less influential than other copious evidence, including Jerkins' poor evaluation in which a senior rater ranked him 58th out of 58 majors.
They also wrote that the severity of Jerkins' crime overcame possible prejudice from the reprimand, as did photographs of the injured toddler depicting "bruising, welts, and abrasions that covered practically the child's entire body." Jerkins had initially told authorities that the boy's injuries were a result of an accidental fall or a dog bite, the dissenting judges noted.
"It is not difficult to fathom that the panel concluded that the severity of the beating and Appellant's mendacity about its circumstances -- standing alone -- warranted the sentence imposed on Appellant," the dissenting justices wrote.
The case will now go back to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. That court can reassess the sentence or order a new sentencing hearing."
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Stephen C. LTC Wayne Brandon LTC Bill Koski Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Capt Seid Waddell Capt Tom Brown MSG Andrew White SFC William Farrell SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SSgt Robert Marx PO1 William "Chip" Nagel SGT John " Mac " McConnell SP5 Mark Kuzinski SP5 Robert Ruck SPC Margaret Higgins SGT Charles H. Hawes SGT (Join to see) Maj Marty Hogan
Even though Maj. David Jerkins was convicted of beating his 3-year-old toddler stepson with a belt. He was a 41-year-old father of nine who'd served 19 years, mostly in the reserves, and had won a leadership award in 2007.
Image: Steve slapping Ranger scroll on Ethan at RIP Graduation - Ranger Memorial, Ft Benning, Ga.
My own U.S. Army Ranger son lost his appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. He was sentenced to 35 years based on testimony which excluded the Article 32 investigation at Fort Benning in 2011. The benighted or somewhat corrupt CG at the time ignored the testimony of the Article 32 and the instructions to the General Court Martial included no prejudicial testimony on the accusers and no accounts of my son's performance of duty while assigned to 3rd BN/75th Rangers on multiple deployments.
"The military's highest court overturned the dismissal of an Army major convicted of beating his toddler stepson, narrowly deciding that a general's reprimand letter improperly influenced the jury.
Maj. David Jerkins was convicted at court-martial in 2014 of assaulting the 3-year-old with a belt. He was a 41-year-old father of nine who'd served 19 years, mostly in the reserves, and had won a leadership award in 2007.
Before he was sentenced to six months in jail and dismissal at Fort Hood, Texas, two Army colonels and two major generals testified to his sterling military qualities and said they'd be proud to continue to serve with him.
Prosecutors seeking to rebut that "good character" evidence were allowed by the judge to show the jury Jerkins' recently-issued reprimand letter.
Issued by the commander of 1st Army Division West, the reprimand was for Jerkins' fraternization with an enlisted soldier. Jerkins and the soldier, the toddler's mother, were married in 2011. Shortly afterwards she became pregnant and left the service.
The reprimand stated that Jerkins had discredited himself and the Army and that it was doubtful he was fit for further service.
The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces ruled that the reprimand was not allowable evidence: it was issued after a fraternization charge for the same conduct was dropped days before Jerkins' arraignment, and it hadn't been finalized because Jerkins hadn't yet responded to it.
As a result, "the "commander's opinion that (Jerkins) was unfit for continued military service -- essentially, a recommendation that he be dismissed from the service -- invaded the province of the members of the court-martial," according to the opinion issued Thursday.
The justices split three to two deciding whether the judge's error was "harmless" or instead made a difference in the jury's sentencing decision.
The two dissenting justices wrote in their opinion that the reprimand was less influential than other copious evidence, including Jerkins' poor evaluation in which a senior rater ranked him 58th out of 58 majors.
They also wrote that the severity of Jerkins' crime overcame possible prejudice from the reprimand, as did photographs of the injured toddler depicting "bruising, welts, and abrasions that covered practically the child's entire body." Jerkins had initially told authorities that the boy's injuries were a result of an accidental fall or a dog bite, the dissenting judges noted.
"It is not difficult to fathom that the panel concluded that the severity of the beating and Appellant's mendacity about its circumstances -- standing alone -- warranted the sentence imposed on Appellant," the dissenting justices wrote.
The case will now go back to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals. That court can reassess the sentence or order a new sentencing hearing."
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Stephen C. LTC Wayne Brandon LTC Bill Koski Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Capt Seid Waddell Capt Tom Brown MSG Andrew White SFC William Farrell SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SSgt Robert Marx PO1 William "Chip" Nagel SGT John " Mac " McConnell SP5 Mark Kuzinski SP5 Robert Ruck SPC Margaret Higgins SGT Charles H. Hawes SGT (Join to see) Maj Marty Hogan
(4)
(0)
LTC Stephen F.
SGT (Join to see) - thanks my friend. He was imprisoned at Fort Leavenworth United States Disciplinary Barracks from 2011 into 2016, then he was transferred to a medium security federal prison in 2017 and now he is in a low security federal prison in his birth state of Mississippi.
He was working on two degrees while at Fort Leavenworth through VA funding [first discharge was honorable. In West Virginia the staff was not supportive. In Mississippi he is back to pursuing his education. He has growth more mature while in prison.
The fact that he has been moved to a low security prison indicates he is being prepared for release- hopefully in the next year or two.
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Stephen C. LTC Orlando Illi LTC (Join to see) LTC Ivan Raiklin, Esq. Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Capt Seid Waddell Capt Jeff S. CPT Jack Durish MSgt Robert C Aldi SFC Stephen King MSgt Danny Hope SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SGT Gregory Lawritson Cpl Craig Marton SP5 Mark Kuzinski Maj Marty Hogan
He was working on two degrees while at Fort Leavenworth through VA funding [first discharge was honorable. In West Virginia the staff was not supportive. In Mississippi he is back to pursuing his education. He has growth more mature while in prison.
The fact that he has been moved to a low security prison indicates he is being prepared for release- hopefully in the next year or two.
FYI COL Mikel J. Burroughs LTC Stephen C. LTC Orlando Illi LTC (Join to see) LTC Ivan Raiklin, Esq. Maj Bill Smith, Ph.D. Capt Seid Waddell Capt Jeff S. CPT Jack Durish MSgt Robert C Aldi SFC Stephen King MSgt Danny Hope SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL SGT Gregory Lawritson Cpl Craig Marton SP5 Mark Kuzinski Maj Marty Hogan
(4)
(0)
Sad news about the toddler, the father definitely needs to be put in a psych ward.
(3)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
No chance of that happening, but as with most child abusers, unfortunately he will do it again. I just hope he doesn’t kill the kid.
(1)
(0)
His superiors felt he was a prince among men and they protected the perp. Sounds like the system decided to step up and protect this perp from justice. I wonder if the 4 yr old learned his lesson from his beating and will grow up to return the same feedback in future years. The perp had better watch his back.
(2)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Capt Tom Brown, I think it depends on how many times he’s abused. Most likely if you’re raised that way, you’ll be that way.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next