Posted on Feb 6, 2018
Deploy or get out: New Pentagon plan could boot thousands of non-deployable troops
6.22K
30
23
2
2
0
Service members who have been non-deployable for the past 12 months or more will be separated from the military, based on new Defense Department policies that are under final review.
Deploy or get out: New Pentagon plan could boot thousands of non-deployable troops
Posted from militarytimes.com
Deployment
Defense
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 9
4
4
0
I agree, I retired because I was not able to deploy as a single father. If you are a Naval Officer you should be on a ship or at least in the normal rotation. LT Brad McInnis CDR Mike Kovack PO1 Jay Lefever Maj Marty Hogan MCPO Roger Collins LTC Ivan Raiklin, Esq. PO1 William "Chip" Nagel SCPO Larry Knight Sr. SCPO David Lockwood PO1 John Y. CWO3 Dennis M. Capt Tom Brown CMDCM Gene Treants MCPO Roger Collins CPO (Join to see) CDR Mike Kovack CPT Jack Durish Col Jim Harmon PO2 Robert Aitchison SMSgt Minister Gerald A. "Doc" Thomas LT Axel Newe
(4)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
CWO3 Dennis M. - Warrant I believe that relates to someone who is in a Non-Deployable status. A sailor on shore duty is still deployable, there were many incidents during the gulf wars that we augmented someone on shore duty to fill a critical deployment overseas for six months. Many of my guys when I was on shore duty asked to do those because they would get the extra pay. Well maybe they wanted to get a way from a spouse for six months.
(2)
(0)
CWO3 Dennis M.
LCDR (Join to see) - I understand and agree. By the way, your last sentence caused me have the first belly roll laugh of the day!
(2)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
CWO3 Dennis M. - I am at least always good for a laugh. I had a bunch of Chiefs with lots of drama on the home front.
(2)
(0)
3
3
0
SGT (Join to see)
Commander in Chief was the issue. we have mad dog as secdef now and hes not just preaching about readiness, hes making them live it.
(0)
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
SGT (Join to see) - Actually this was going on before Barry, we had troops that would never deploy and they bounced all over the place but never were discharged. When you need troops to deploy it doesn't help when you have more broke, lazy and shifty bodies then deploy able.
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
yes I agree to some degree. its seemed to get exponentially worse in those year though. or maybe it was that I just started personally seeing more often.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
Fifteen of my 21 years were at sea. Of the five remaining, teaching or training assignments. As noted earlier, normal rotation. There must be major differences in this area, with the Army. Non rotation wasn’t a choice for me. It is a pet peeve of mine that some SMs continuously managed to get staff duty, which resulted in promotions and plum assignments.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google