9
9
0
Their are no words to express my disdain for all the Liberal Whiners that fight immigration reform and resist the the demise of sanctuary cities. This maggot Sayfullo Saipov , immigrated to US in 2010.
New York terror attack: Don't offend anyone
Posted from foxnews.comPosted in these groups: 
Immigration
Terrorism
Immigration Terrorism
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 7
7
7
0
This will continue and get worse. ISIS is an ideology and can not be stopped by physical force. It must be attached by the power of the pen. Deportations, fines, etc...
Those that were murdered today we're murdered for being Infidels inside the House of War.
Mosques and Maddressas are preaching the Uhmma must form a Caliphate and attack Jews and Infidels.
It can be stopped. But, we have to recognize the enemy.
Otherwise, more children will grow up without one, or more of their parents.
War was declared a long time ago on us. We need to be smart and move forward.
Those that were murdered today we're murdered for being Infidels inside the House of War.
Mosques and Maddressas are preaching the Uhmma must form a Caliphate and attack Jews and Infidels.
It can be stopped. But, we have to recognize the enemy.
Otherwise, more children will grow up without one, or more of their parents.
War was declared a long time ago on us. We need to be smart and move forward.
(7)
(0)
6
6
0
What I grow weary of is the politicians coming to the microphone and telling us vapid things like "we cannot let them change the way we live, we cannot let them win, we will continue to live our lives normally etc."
For the people that perish in these attacks, their lives have changed. They are dead. Their families will have to bury them and move on and see the empty chair at dinner and the missed holidays and events for the rest of their lives.
What we need is action from leaders to stop the killing. They all know we need to limit immigration from dangerous areas and we need to be far more aggressive in investigating radical mosques and people. They virtue signal and bask in political correctness until the next attack and tell us not to change the way we live or they win. Standing in front of microphones but taking no decisive action is what many of them do.
Since 9-11 we have changed the way we live. How many of you have had to serve in a war, lose friends or family members. How many attacks have we had here in the US that have killed citizens? Do you pay more attention when you are out in public, do you think more about the dangers?
For the people that perish in these attacks, their lives have changed. They are dead. Their families will have to bury them and move on and see the empty chair at dinner and the missed holidays and events for the rest of their lives.
What we need is action from leaders to stop the killing. They all know we need to limit immigration from dangerous areas and we need to be far more aggressive in investigating radical mosques and people. They virtue signal and bask in political correctness until the next attack and tell us not to change the way we live or they win. Standing in front of microphones but taking no decisive action is what many of them do.
Since 9-11 we have changed the way we live. How many of you have had to serve in a war, lose friends or family members. How many attacks have we had here in the US that have killed citizens? Do you pay more attention when you are out in public, do you think more about the dangers?
(6)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
MSgt Steve Sweeney - These are countries that are unable to vet their own people or provide information to properly vet them on our end. These are countries that may have very poor or weak passport and visa control administration etc. We know that both the Obama administration and the Trump Administration have identified some of these areas. That would be a start. Way to focus on two words in the entire post and miss the larger point as though you had found a boogeyman or something.
I also travel internationally and avoid public transportation such as subways or buses and use Taxis or hired vehicles almost exclusively. 10-15 years ago that was not the case. I almost always used the subways and trains in Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, London etc. We have and continue to change the way we live even though the political class likes to act like we haven't or shouldn't.
I also travel internationally and avoid public transportation such as subways or buses and use Taxis or hired vehicles almost exclusively. 10-15 years ago that was not the case. I almost always used the subways and trains in Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, London etc. We have and continue to change the way we live even though the political class likes to act like we haven't or shouldn't.
(1)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
MSgt Steve Sweeney - Steve, you asked me to define dangerous areas and ignored the larger point. We call that picking the fly shit out of the pepper where I come from. The larger point is we need action to stop allowing people that would do us harm in and could use far less of the warm air over the vocal chords we get from politicians spewing platitudes that make little sense. Not trying to be defensive only clear.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
MSgt Steve Sweeney - Another nice distraction Steve. The reference to danger was in regard to immigration and the risks from those that would do us violence. It had nothing to do with the outback, the Alps or your other weak examples.
I know you haven't read every post I have ever made here and I cannot possible type out every position on every issue in every post each time I respond to a similar issue. We have had many discussion about the current immigration EO Trump has issued (for the same countries Obama cited as well.
Your attempt at a cheap shot at by attempting to infer I might want to ban immigration from all Islamic countries is a cheap and juvenile swipe at trying to pin a some sort of islmaphobic moniker on me. Nice try but pretty lame nonetheless. You might be shocked to learn you are not as insightful as you think.
The first amendment does not apply to those we may or may not allow to immigrate to the US. The congress can (and has) passed laws that give the President (any president) wide latitude on where we will allow immigration from, what countries we might limit it from and what we might allow none from.
I know you haven't read every post I have ever made here and I cannot possible type out every position on every issue in every post each time I respond to a similar issue. We have had many discussion about the current immigration EO Trump has issued (for the same countries Obama cited as well.
Your attempt at a cheap shot at by attempting to infer I might want to ban immigration from all Islamic countries is a cheap and juvenile swipe at trying to pin a some sort of islmaphobic moniker on me. Nice try but pretty lame nonetheless. You might be shocked to learn you are not as insightful as you think.
The first amendment does not apply to those we may or may not allow to immigrate to the US. The congress can (and has) passed laws that give the President (any president) wide latitude on where we will allow immigration from, what countries we might limit it from and what we might allow none from.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
Whats truly saddening are the F-Tards who want to compare theses inhuman POS to those running form death and destruction LEGALLY. They want to defend this evil POS with standard libtard snowflake methodology, they also like to block responses on their post because as usual they have no argument. They should sponsor folks like this murder into their homes them it would be a self correcting solution.
(3)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
Cynthia Croft - I think that you are not understanding the point that 1SG Hicks is trying to make.
1SG Hicks is trying to point out the hypocrisy of the majority of these people that verbally and politically support illegal immigration, sanctuary cities and the like. As an example that I have given many times in the past; these hypocrites will not personally sponsor or directly support ANY immigrant, but will demand that our tax dollars be used to support, house, and transport the 'undocumented', 'unfortunate', 'nationless' immigrant.
The response that I usually get:
I do not have the funds or I would.
I am not in a position to do it now.
My children and family come first.
Funny when it comes to taking money directly out of their pocket or when it imposes a direct and substantial burden on their personal responsibility that they come up with excuses. But they are fine with it as long as someone else is paying for it or the government is paying for it. Interesting that they are not willing to spend their own money, but when it comes to everyone else's, that they have not a care in the world. And they would be the first ones to be screaming that their rights are being trampled when and if the government forced them to take the 'immigrant' into their own home.
1SG Hicks is trying to point out the hypocrisy of the majority of these people that verbally and politically support illegal immigration, sanctuary cities and the like. As an example that I have given many times in the past; these hypocrites will not personally sponsor or directly support ANY immigrant, but will demand that our tax dollars be used to support, house, and transport the 'undocumented', 'unfortunate', 'nationless' immigrant.
The response that I usually get:
I do not have the funds or I would.
I am not in a position to do it now.
My children and family come first.
Funny when it comes to taking money directly out of their pocket or when it imposes a direct and substantial burden on their personal responsibility that they come up with excuses. But they are fine with it as long as someone else is paying for it or the government is paying for it. Interesting that they are not willing to spend their own money, but when it comes to everyone else's, that they have not a care in the world. And they would be the first ones to be screaming that their rights are being trampled when and if the government forced them to take the 'immigrant' into their own home.
(1)
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
Cynthia Croft - One of the people that I was referring to happens to have made a statement on this discussion that you have responded to. You know what the reaction was on their part - to block me from commenting on their comments. And that is just one of the hypocrites right here on RallyPoint, that illustrates what 1SG Dennis Hicks and myself have stated.
(2)
(0)
1SG Dennis Hicks
And we have the usual drivel from the loony's, saying we have to let the bad in with the good,total failure of critical thinking all across. Its always OK to sacrifice teh innocent so that Libtards can virtue signal without having to pay the price for their failed ideas.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google