Posted on Jan 9, 2014
Who is your greatest 5 Star General/Admiral or above of all time in the United States of America military and why?
28.5K
827
148
39
38
1
General of the Army Douglas MacArthur (26 January 1880 – 5 April 1964) was an American general and field marshal of the Philippine Army who was Chief of Staff of the United States Army during the 1930s and played a prominent role in the Pacific theater during World War II. He received the Medal of Honor for his service in the Philippines Campaign, which made him and his father Arthur MacArthur, Jr., the first father and son to be awarded the medal. He was one of only five men ever to rise to the rank of General of the Army in the U.S. Army, and the only man ever to become a field marshal in the Philippine Army.
SPC Margaret Higgins COL Mikel J. Burroughs CPL Dave Hoover Lt Col Charlie Brown Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen SCPO Morris Ramsey PVT Mark Zehner Sgt (Join to see) SSG Michael Noll SSG Robert Mark Odom CPL Douglas Chrysler PO1 Tony Holland] SPC Mark Huddleston CW5 Jack Cardwell PO1 William "Chip" Nagel PO1 Lyndon Thomas PO3 Phyllis Maynard SGT Mark Estes Maj Marty Hogan Capt Dwayne Conyers
SPC Margaret Higgins COL Mikel J. Burroughs CPL Dave Hoover Lt Col Charlie Brown Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen SCPO Morris Ramsey PVT Mark Zehner Sgt (Join to see) SSG Michael Noll SSG Robert Mark Odom CPL Douglas Chrysler PO1 Tony Holland] SPC Mark Huddleston CW5 Jack Cardwell PO1 William "Chip" Nagel PO1 Lyndon Thomas PO3 Phyllis Maynard SGT Mark Estes Maj Marty Hogan Capt Dwayne Conyers
Edited 4 y ago
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 60
Strictly 5-star, Fleet Admiral Nimitz. In a past life, I wanted to be a submarine officer. Silent, calm, cool, collected, cunning. Nimitz is my guy, always, everytime (and especially when played by Henry Fonda, lol!)
If we're counting the super-high-are-they-five-stars-or-not, Admiral of the Navy Dewey is a good one to study, but I have to admit I think I'd still put Nimitz above Dewey, personally.
If we're counting the super-high-are-they-five-stars-or-not, Admiral of the Navy Dewey is a good one to study, but I have to admit I think I'd still put Nimitz above Dewey, personally.
(3)
(0)
MacArthur was a attention seeking prima donna who was highly overrated. Korea proved that. I'd have to say Hap Arnold. Must have been hard building a professional air force under the then bureaucracy of the Army. He managed and was the only 5 star General in 2 branches of the Military (Army-Air Force)
(3)
(0)
Absolutely without a doubt General Aelius Maximus Of Gladiator movie fame played by Russell Crow
Sorry could not resist.
My vote is General Omar Bradley. Known as the Soldier's General. Very objective and treated his soldiers with dignity and respect
A quote from General
George C. Marshall called him "quiet, unassuming, capable, with sound common sense. Absolute dependability. Give him a job and forget it
Sorry could not resist.
My vote is General Omar Bradley. Known as the Soldier's General. Very objective and treated his soldiers with dignity and respect
A quote from General
George C. Marshall called him "quiet, unassuming, capable, with sound common sense. Absolute dependability. Give him a job and forget it
(3)
(0)
My personal opinion:
General Robert E. Lee. The single greatest general in U.S. history. He lacked the political prowess to be a very successful general, but that doesn't mean he was bad. In fact, I'd say that would make him even better. He repeatedly won merit for conduct and bravery in war. His tactical skills were only bested by the political mind of Lincoln.
I'm still torn on whether he was the very definition of an American patriot or a traitor...
General Robert E. Lee. The single greatest general in U.S. history. He lacked the political prowess to be a very successful general, but that doesn't mean he was bad. In fact, I'd say that would make him even better. He repeatedly won merit for conduct and bravery in war. His tactical skills were only bested by the political mind of Lincoln.
I'm still torn on whether he was the very definition of an American patriot or a traitor...
(3)
(0)
Lt Col Clay Cowgill
Robert E. Lee was a patriot. Best in his class at West Point. Engineering officer and hero in the Mexican war. Superintendent of West Point, hand picked by President Buchanan to put down John Brown at Harper's Ferry, offered command of the Union Army after Fort Sumter. Resigned rather than lead an invasion of the south. Quite a resume spanning over 30 years.
(4)
(0)
Dwight Eisenhower is a personal hero of mine for pulling the trigger on D-Day. That was one tough decision.
(3)
(0)
General of the Army Omar Bradley, anyone who had to deal Lt General Patton, even when he personally felt that he should been shipped back to the States for incidents some of the incidents that did in North Africa and Italy, during the campaign in Europe. To be able to keep him and his Ego in check in the best and worst of times after he was came ashore in France, in no short testimony to his his abilities of Leaderships. Sure he had his flaws and his limitations, but look at the list of Division he helped in with organizing that included the 28th and 82nd Infantry Divisions. One of his famous quotes while Commander of the 28th Infantry came after he received order to send a cadre to help form another new Division, to which he responded with, "When are you going to send me Cadre to organize a Division here." When you consider he had to work beside and sometime under the Command of Marshal Montgomery, and having much longer supply lines, he did the what he could keep his units moving.
(3)
(0)
SSG Maurice P.
PV2 SHAULL YOU GOT GENERAL PATTON MESSED UP.............SURE ENOUGH HE HAD A GIGANTIC EGO BUT HE HAD THE BIG NASTY BALLS TO GO WITH IT...SLAPPING THAT PRIVATE WASNT SHIT BUT IT ALMOST ENDED HIS CAREER...IN THE GERMAN ARMY THEY SHOT COWARDS ON THE SPOT NO TRIAL................PATTON WAS THE ARMY'S GREATEST GENERAL BESIDES WASHINGTON AND WAINWRIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!GO ARMY ARMOR
(2)
(0)
PV2 Abbott Shaull
Yes, I know he had the nasty to go with it, and to back it. If he had lived, and not died in 1945 who knows what he could of done later. He Brilliant Armor and mobile warfare Commander. I think being in charge of the mock Army before the invasion of Normandy was Brilliant and Outstanding. It was exactly who the Germans would have expect to lead the initial invasion, with the exception of Marshal Montgomery. Then assigning him to Army later was good move, even though General Bradley actively didn't want him. He had charisma to drive his Army forward just on will, who need petrol or ammo. Sure he drove his units at time where they did literally out of gas, at times. That the type of General he was. Everyone in his Chain of Command accepted this once, he was selected to lead an Army Command. It was to him acceptable risk. Same when he sent Combat Command from the 9 Armored Division IIRC to rescue his son in law and other POWs from German Prison of War Camp. It drove Bradley crazy because in his position of the Commander of the 21st Army Group. He always had to second guess Montgomery to the North was doing, and I have seen somewhere where Bradley was called too cautious, and then second guess what Patton would do, and somehow try to keep him from running away to far ahead. Talking about using caution, Marshal Montgomery was kind of bi-polar in how his operations went, generally his operation were slow tempo, but when he would everyone once and great while get hair brain ideas like Operation Market Garden due to pressure influence or personal desire to beat the Russians to Berlin. Either way the 12th Army Group granted fought in several built up areas, and what not, but their operations were costly due to the tactics used up and down their Chain of Command.
Patton was beyond the doubt the best tactical US Army Commander on the field in Europe in WWII. Not taking away from any other Army Commanders, Bradley, or Ike. Bradley had a difficult job dealing with Marshal Montgomery, and Ike had other Senior British Commanders to deal with at times felt he was to weak and to soft at times. The Allied Supreme Command at the top was strange and anything in the planning was always hard fought.
Patton didn't have to micro-manage, his Commanders never like him show up, much like in the Civil War when General Grant would show up somewhere with the Army of the Potomac. Patton did have several quirks, and would go on rants, and gig people. Yet, the Commanders under him worked harder to make sure they doing their mission and their people were squared away. For the most part it kept discipline, and kept them safer, and helped them that much more when they were under the stresses of combat. Much because he didn't relax all the standards because they were on the battlefield. He understood what had to be relax for the safety of the men, and could be enforce. You don't find someone who has the ability to have that much Common Sense, and ability to maneuver troops as he did, even though he didn't have patience for Logistic.
Would of been something to see what he would done if he had life past 1945. Where he would of ended up in history.
Patton was beyond the doubt the best tactical US Army Commander on the field in Europe in WWII. Not taking away from any other Army Commanders, Bradley, or Ike. Bradley had a difficult job dealing with Marshal Montgomery, and Ike had other Senior British Commanders to deal with at times felt he was to weak and to soft at times. The Allied Supreme Command at the top was strange and anything in the planning was always hard fought.
Patton didn't have to micro-manage, his Commanders never like him show up, much like in the Civil War when General Grant would show up somewhere with the Army of the Potomac. Patton did have several quirks, and would go on rants, and gig people. Yet, the Commanders under him worked harder to make sure they doing their mission and their people were squared away. For the most part it kept discipline, and kept them safer, and helped them that much more when they were under the stresses of combat. Much because he didn't relax all the standards because they were on the battlefield. He understood what had to be relax for the safety of the men, and could be enforce. You don't find someone who has the ability to have that much Common Sense, and ability to maneuver troops as he did, even though he didn't have patience for Logistic.
Would of been something to see what he would done if he had life past 1945. Where he would of ended up in history.
(4)
(0)
All mentioned are worthy. I don't have much respect for Adm King though.
Washington is certainly the sentimental favorite and was a hell of a commander.
I reluctantly choose two: MacArthur and Nimitz. They managed to mold two strategies into a winning plan in an extremely difficult theater. And didn't make a lot of mistakes on the way.
My opinion only. Your results may vary.
Washington is certainly the sentimental favorite and was a hell of a commander.
I reluctantly choose two: MacArthur and Nimitz. They managed to mold two strategies into a winning plan in an extremely difficult theater. And didn't make a lot of mistakes on the way.
My opinion only. Your results may vary.
(3)
(0)
1.GENERAL OF THE ARMIES WASHINGTON
2.FLEET ADMIRAL CHESTER W NIMITZ
3.FLEET ADMIRAL BULL HALSEY
2.FLEET ADMIRAL CHESTER W NIMITZ
3.FLEET ADMIRAL BULL HALSEY
(3)
(0)
Read This Next