Once talent reaches Everest, are designations meaningful for tension or retention? [~138758:COL Mikel Burroughs] [~2583:Lt Col Mark W. Burns] [~4812:Lt Col Erika Cashin] [~1346405:Lt Col Charlie Brown] [~319202:MAJ Bill Maynard] [~385188:Capt Marty Hogan] [~428393:Capt Christian D. Orr] [~168853:PO1 William "Chip" Nagel] [~368184:SSG James J. Palmer IV aka "JP4"]

Posted on Mar 31, 2018

Once talent reaches Everest, are designations meaningful for tension or retention?

CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana

19.5K

10

3

5

0

Posted in these groups: Talent management logo

Talent Management Human resources logo

Human Resources

Posted >1 y ago

Follow this discussion

Above Earth designations give nothing but tension.

Reaching such a height deserves retention.;

At the highest level, designations are meaningless.

Designations are meaningful, even at the highest level, because it is necessary to distinguish MD from the CEO and the Board Chairman; who drives business.

See Results

Responses: 2

1

0

SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL

Posted >1 y ago

CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana wow great question, I have to think about it.

(1)

Comment

(0)

CPT Gurinder (Gene) Rana

>1 y

Once on Everest, talent turns to genius and in Genius there is only one threshold humans can understand - GENIUS!

(0)

Reply

(0)

0

Lt Col Charlie Brown

Posted >1 y ago

Interesting phrasing of the question. It took me a while to decide what you were asking. As for designations, someone has to be in charge and responsible for the final decisions.

(0)

Comment

(0)

Once talent reaches Everest, are designations meaningful for tension or retention?

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.