Has Mr. Trump taken his insurgent campaign too far by questioning the legitimacy of our free elections?

It's just my opinion but any time we have even ONE case of confirmed/proven fraud, then it calls into question the entire results. How many more cases were NOT detected or proven? Can we really say the results are legitimate considering just a small handful of votes in key areas can change the entire electoral college outcome (I think it was MAJ (Join to see) that pointed that out first)?

How many general election ballots? If there is 834 million, Houston we have a problem.

Have you watched the Project Veritas reports? They are clearly demonstrating ample evidence bringing into question the legitimacy of the US election process. Watch it then reconsider your response to this question

I quite reading when I saw "Vox" ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a VERY biased, anti Trump, liberal propaganda machine...One thing Trump has gotten right is , politics as usual, isnt working, and needs real change. I hear of "fear" Trump supporters are going to be intimidating voters at the polls, what a joke. If you want threats,riots,looting,and intimidation,,,,find some Hillary supporters. Liberals like the freedoms of speech and protest, BUT no responsibility or tolerance of the conservative values that made their liberal views possible............

Or does he question a system people have manipulated to their own benefit? It's hard to say!

Can agree with arguments that even one case of voter fraud is grounds to do something. Most folks would agree, but the question is what to do about it.

If you want to avoid even the appearance of voter disenfranchisement, which should be just as big of a deal to those worried about voter fraud, then a national ID card is about the best, possible, remedy. The cards should be issued over a two to three year period, where the IDs will be available via mobile centers, that will visit remote locations, be made available at night and on weekends (for shift workers and such), at nursing homes, hospitals, poorer neighborhoods, richer neighborhoods, et cetera.

Voting is treated so haphazardly, it is almost funny - Federal law should cover all elections that place someone into Federal office - then, if a state or other locale wishes to use some other system for their own elections, they can bear the costs. This should apply to both primaries and general elections, both being held on one day - the primary on 08JUN and the General on 08NOV, with adequate options for early and postal voting, as long as the ID is verified. If someone appears at a polling station without their ID, a provisional ballot should be taken and then followed up to determine if the vote is legitimate.

After the initial issuance period, then, most likely, the Social Security Administration, will be charged with issuing the credential, separate from someone's SSN, as each person is issued a SSN.

The new ID would, also, help to curb the hiring of folks who should not be working or working 'off the books' or 'under the table' and if someone is on a job site (of any type) without an ID that the company appropriately registered, both the individual and the company will be held liable. Also, make the penalties for creating fake IDs quite drastic and using one, *slightly* less severe - that should help to curb most issues.

Yes, there will be a cost involved, but the card could be used for a few purposes, that currently are served by an odd combination of state, local, and Federal identification, so the benefits should outweigh the cost. Even though not the largest facing the country, takes far too much time and attention from the other, bigger problems and has a fairly simple remedy.

Fix it, now, and move along.

I don't think so.

And the studies that show an extremely small number of voters cannot be correct.

I dismiss any reporting about dead people still be registered. Who care as long as they aren't voting.

There are too many reports of dead people voting. All you have to do is search "dead people voting" and read the news ports. Ok, discount any news sources who are pro-Trump but there are numerous investigations going on right now dead people voting and some have voted for years after they passed away.

How do some election officials try to explain dead people voting? They say, Oh, people were just signing by the name of the wrong person when they voted. It takes a whole lot of faith to be able to believe that.

Any of the referenced cases are hundreds more than 35 M&Ms.

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2016/09/22/cbs4-investigation-finds-dead-voters-casting-ballots-in-colorado/

COL Lee Flemming
Sir, are you saying we should start ignoring the documented examples of voter fraud already taking place weeks before the election takes place because we do not want to damage the public's confidence?
I think if the public's confidence is built upon a confident system it will not be broken but if it is dishonest, why should we want confidence in it? Dishonesty and corruption should be rooted out immediately because we want confidence in the system? How is it thumbing your nose at something if what you are pointing out is corruption through out the system? The reason Donald Trump has risen to the level he has is because people are already disgusted with the corruption they see?

Sir our election process has been riddles with fraud for decades, dead folks voting, some folks voting many more times than once. This is a known fact that gets whitewashed all the time. I would no more believe anything from VOX than I would believe the lies from Hillary.

Most Definitely! Voter Fraud has been Republicans Dogma since from when Reagan was running and like any religious dogma it has no basis in Facts or Reality. Their Beliefs are always more important to them than Facts. The Biggest Pimp, Drug Pusher of the Concept these days is Attny Gen for Kansas Kris Kobach (KKK) and he got laws passed that gave him almost God like powers to address this Fake Issue. Since has Prosecuted 6 cases here in Kansas and Won 3, Population of Kansas is 3 Million or .0001. They have trouble accepting that others disagree with them or it is a Tool or more correctly an Excuse they use for their Voter Disenfranchisement Progroms.