Are you aware of the true nature of our Government's agenda?

The document is genuine, but should be taken in context. The U.S. and the Soviet Union were looking for a formal approach to disarmament talks. They finally agreed that the U.N. could be helpful in this respect. The state department wrote this U.N. proposal which was introduced to the U.N. Quite, obviously,as the negotiations progressed, neither side decided that this particular plan was going to meet their needs, so both sides backed away from it. Fortunately, however, the discussions from this U.N. proposal paved the way for nuclear weapon treaties in the next 20 years. The document does not (as some claim) carry the weight of law and was not a goal of any administration in the past 25 years. Nowhere does the document refer to privately owned arms.

Everyone should read it for themselves: http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html

I disagree that there's a "plot" in the works, from JFK through all the presidents in the intervening years to take guns away from the American people and "give up our constitution to the U.N." Sure, I agree that gun restrictions have been introduced, but this sounds to me like a conspiracy theory run amok.

Good luck trying to take my weapons. Molon Labe

SrA Greg Hardin, from Benjamin Franklin, “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”

You got a copy of this doc?

I'm pretty sure there's a video about this from Ranger Up . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjAl_kbAxmc

Well, I hope that we are able to see after these attacks in Paris, the UN can't stop people from attacking us! While I understand the fear that guns can be dangerous to society, there are many that are law abiding citizens that shouldn't be penalized.

As Colonel Sherman T. Potter would say, "Horsehockey!" Even if this was a legitimate thing trying to be implemented there is no way in Hell the American people are going to give up their arms just for the U.N. to take them and enforce their laws upon our country. No way, no how.

Umm...
It is true there was an ill-advised UN treaty attempt to ban small arms sales. Leaving all weapons in the hands of governments and criminals. Great idea. So it got voted down.

Presidents all along the line could have espoused this view, but none but the very fringe of candidates has. The reason the second amendment exists is so that the citizen can protect himself from the tyranny of the GOVERNMENT. If someone truly believes that the second amendment must go, there is a process for that. Open debate. 2/3 vote by both houses of Congress. Ratification by 3/4 of state legislatures. Go ahead and try. Let's have this debate. I wager that even the most fringe congressman wouldn't dare introduce this bill, and if they did, it would not get far.

Let's find out.

Negative vote for pegging the needle in the category "Lacks Verisimilitude."