Posted on Jun 14, 2015
SFC Stephen King
7.07K
93
40
7
7
0
Posted in these groups: Drug Drugs
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 24
SGM Matthew Quick
5
5
0
Yes...it catches those that think they're smarter than testing.

However, random testing does not affect those that don't care.
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Stephen King
SFC Stephen King
>1 y
True statement I appreciate your candor @SGM Matthew Quick.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S.
SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S.
>1 y
So you would have no problem with the police searching your house any time they want?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGM Matthew Quick
SGM Matthew Quick
>1 y
I'm not sure how this escalated from a random urinalysis to home searches, SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S....but you keep on grasping, I guess.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S.
SPC Jan Allbright, M.Sc., R.S.
>1 y
OK .. tell me the difference between one unwarranted search lacking reasonable cause and another?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CH (COL) Geoff Bailey
3
3
0
Random can work when used in conjunction with 100% followed by a repeat 100% 48-72 hours later.
(3)
Comment
(0)
TSgt Kevin Buccola
TSgt Kevin Buccola
>1 y
With the new drugs today you need it is hard to catch - some of these are out of your system within 24-48 hours. Have a surprise check on saturday or sunday mornings at 0500 hrs..you would be surprised to see the numbers
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Stephen King
SFC Stephen King
>1 y
Sunday 0900
(2)
Reply
(0)
CH (COL) Geoff Bailey
CH (COL) Geoff Bailey
>1 y
SFC Stephen King , that is also a key component...surprise checks at an off time. They've implemented that here at Drum.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CSM David Heidke
2
2
0
Although it works to highlight who is abusing substances, it takes far too long to separate those who are. The paperwork is onerous at best... Only one piece of paper should be needed, the positive test.
(2)
Comment
(0)
TSgt Joshua Copeland
TSgt Joshua Copeland
>1 y
CSM David Heidke, I agree with the sentiment, but the the statement as is. A confirmed, non-false positive, non-prescribed (taken correctly), without mitigating circumstances (IE no-intentional ingestion).
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close