Posted on Apr 17, 2017
CSM Charles Hayden
8.82K
10
7
3
3
0
670-1 dtd 3Feb2005 has depictions on page 66, fig 15.7 showing trouser w/o a 'break' over the front of low quarter shoes.

I recall asking for, 'no break' in the crease of my trousers over my shoe laces. The ? hem was then lowered to slightly cover the heel of the shoes.

Inistutional memory, greybeards?
Posted in these groups: Afp getty 511269685 Dress Uniform454274742x356 DA Pam 670-1
Avatar feed
Responses: 5
1SG First Sergeant
2
2
0
CSM Hayden;
I feel that the Army has changed AR 670-1 so many times now that its hard to keep up with the changes. The Army realized recently that we had too many AR's and FM's so there attempt to make it more conducive was by adding ADP's and TC's into the mix. This has given us even more to try to weed out. Some leaders still follow the AR's while some follow the ADP's and TC's so now everyone is referencing different information. I feel less informed and knowledgeable now and have to crunch to learn these new standards. It seems like the Army is attempting to lower the standard to conform to the younger generation. We are still using the military as a social experiment.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CSM Charles Hayden
CSM Charles Hayden
>1 y
Four letter word comment! @SFC David Hayes
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Member
1
1
0
670-1 is an interesting read, and as I understand has been updated a lot in the last decade.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Kevin Storm
1
1
0
I always had the slight break. but it seemed to always be more than what I was after.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close