17
17
0
According to a recent nationwide study, only 13% of college and university presidents believe that "Most Americans have an accurate view of the purpose of higher education." Interestingly enough, the survey didn't reveal what these administrators thought the purpose of higher education was. In your opinion, what is the purpose of higher education? Is it to train individuals for a career? Is it to help individuals grow personally and intellectually?
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 29
Posted >1 y ago
This is a helluva good question. Once upon a time, I thought I knew. I'm not so sure anymore. Our institutions of higher education have been perverted into indoctrination centers and I can't see any downside except that people who attend them come away with a complete lack of ability to think for themselves. They possess no common sense. Now, before you dismiss me as some old crackpot, let me assure you that I am. I've seen too much to avoid being old or a crackpot. I lived in Colorado at a time when the state considered allowing people who had studied law in a legal practice under the tutelage of a practicing lawyer, to take the bar exam and become licensed attorneys. The law schools made sure that went away. I've seen doctors fresh out of medical school who need nurses to teach them the ropes of practicing medicine. The truth is, that people learn professions by practicing them. That's why they're called medical practices and legal practices. Meanwhile, engineering students are taught engineering on the job. Their degrees seem to prepare them for that profession as practiced in another age, long ago, when their professors might have been engineers. Shall I go on? Naw. That's enough for now. In all my years, I hoped for much from college grads and learned to expect little. Hopefully they could read. Many couldn't. Better yet, read for understanding. That was really rare. Research. Debate. Cipher (you know, basic math) The scientific method? Good luck finding that. History? Civics? Not one iota.
(14)
Comment
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
MSG Dan Walther - And the barriers to entry into the job field, a doctor needs a medical degree, a lawyer needs a law degree, and engineer needs an engineering degree. but do they really, Universities have a monopoly on the good paying white color jobs, because of law, not due to nature. For instance someone working in an engineering firm can never be a PE regardless of their knowledge base and experience they can have all the requisit knowlege from years studying, but can't practice without checking the university box. For engineers and doctors it's not that off kilter, but for a high school teacher, give me a break, I'm qualified to teach 18 year old aspiring teachers how to teach at a university, but I can't teach the 18 year old kids without a 4 year study plan and an education degree??? I'm sorry but there are other ways to learn the required skills, but unions have lobbied to make becoming a teacher difficult so they have a teacher shortage and need to pay the teachers more, and you can't fire your teachers who can't teach. The only way to become a teacher is to decide when you are 19. There is no economic viable option once you have a degree in Math, because a person with a math degree can't teach high school math, only an education degree counts in many of our states.
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC Ken Connolly
5 y
I have nieces and nephews graduating from colleges and all have some really challenging careers. One of my nieces works on a team developing and marking computer games and she is not the team administrator. :)
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Angela Van Horn
10 mo
>"Our institutions of higher education have been perverted into indoctrination centers..."
Accurate or not as that may be, sir, I really don't think any of us who put on the uniform have any place to criticize such a concept too heavily. BCT was designed to indoctrinate new SMs just as much as to teach one how to shoot, move and communicate
Accurate or not as that may be, sir, I really don't think any of us who put on the uniform have any place to criticize such a concept too heavily. BCT was designed to indoctrinate new SMs just as much as to teach one how to shoot, move and communicate
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Alan Simmons
9 mo
I ran into this issue and teach at a local community college. I always wanted to teach at the university level but soon became disillusioned as I finished my Ph.D. My degree fields are in U.S. History (both in 1865 and since 1865), focusing on U.S. Foreign Policy. What I encountered in my dissertation process and prelims was anything but horrifying. I was not allowed to come to my conclusions (go where the facts take me in determining my own opinion) but was always encouraged (threatened, ridiculed, coerced) to adopt the more approved, Left-leaning indoctrination way of looking at American history and foreign policy.
I played the game as I was forced to regurgitate their notions that the U.S. only used atomic bombs on Japan because Americans are racist. America started the Vietnam War because America hated Asians and wanted an Asian colony. I also heard the tired line that the only reason for two wars in the Middle East was for oil. I endured harassment from one of my dissertation members who openly stated all veterans are no better than Nazi stooges.
It was a struggle, but I did finally finish. I taught at two universities when I first completed my Ph.D. but did not like it - I ran afoul of some faculty members who insisted my job was to teach the students "what to think." I now teach at a community college where I can teach students "how to think."
I played the game as I was forced to regurgitate their notions that the U.S. only used atomic bombs on Japan because Americans are racist. America started the Vietnam War because America hated Asians and wanted an Asian colony. I also heard the tired line that the only reason for two wars in the Middle East was for oil. I endured harassment from one of my dissertation members who openly stated all veterans are no better than Nazi stooges.
It was a struggle, but I did finally finish. I taught at two universities when I first completed my Ph.D. but did not like it - I ran afoul of some faculty members who insisted my job was to teach the students "what to think." I now teach at a community college where I can teach students "how to think."
(0)
Reply
(0)
Posted >1 y ago
Being a BA or MA is usually the key to get a job in a corporate setting. A PHD is normally of value, if seriously applied. The ability to research subjects and evaluate them is what separates them from other which results in advancing in a corporate structure. There are exceptions. I have hired all sorts of education levels, the PHD is the only one that was able to pass me up, on occasion. Most of them were arrogant self centered A-holes.
(4)
Comment
(0)
A1C Medrick "Rick" DeVaney
1 y
When I Was The Purchasing Dept Director. For FM.C.; The Plant Manager, Jim McClung, And I Were Traveling Together., Temporarily, Between The Indiana & Michigan Plants, When Jim Had Just Completed His PhD..... I Congratulated Jim, And He Said To Me "Rick, Do You Know What PhD Really Means"? So I Turned To Jim, KNOWING He Was Up To Something, And Said "Tell Me Jim, What Does It Mean"?.. He Replied: "All It Really Means Is 'Piled Higher And Deeper"
(0)
Reply
(0)
Edited 2 mo ago
Posted 2 mo ago
The main reason is to provide a person with everything needed for a successful career path in the future. In university, you learn a lot and acquire many skills, such as time management, communication, problem-solving, and so on. I think that higher education is still very important. I always wanted to be a student, and it's harder than I thought, but I have no regrets at all. When I have some problems with writing, for example, I use https://edubirdie.com/pay-for-essays and it always helps me out. And I work on my skills, and I know they improve. And I also met a lot of good people, which is also good for the future. Connections are so important now.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Read This Next