Posted on Apr 11, 2023
Why it's unlikely ethics rules on Supreme Court gift disclosures will work
593
27
5
11
11
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
I guess the crux of Judge Thomas' situation is if Harlan Crow is treated as a 'long-time personal friend' or a 'Republican donor'. Under the previous guidance most, if not all, of the visits could be reported either way depending on if you are a supporter of his or a detractor.
Supporters will say he was a long-time personal friends and the trips didn't have to be reported.
Detractors will say he was a Republican Donor and the trips did have to be reported.
... and it will all come down to partisan bickering again.
Supporters will say he was a long-time personal friends and the trips didn't have to be reported.
Detractors will say he was a Republican Donor and the trips did have to be reported.
... and it will all come down to partisan bickering again.
(6)
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel good day Brother William, always informational and of the most interesting. Thanks for sharing, have a blessed day!
(4)
(0)
The stricter rules went into effect mid-March, yet he hasn't reported for 2 decades? Something doesn't compute... new math?
(2)
(0)
SFC Ralph E Kelley
Exactly. All he has to say is, "I have not reported any this since the mid-March date because its 2024."
COL Randall C.
COL Randall C.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next