Posted on Jul 30, 2024
Veteran CNN Anchor Departs Network, Advocates for Gun Rights in Legal Battle - Page Traveler
814
62
8
21
21
0
Lynne Russell, a renowned CNN anchor from the past, is now making headlines of her own. Known for her significant contributions to the popular Headline News program, she reported on important national stories that shaped our world. Today, she’s stepping into a new role as the leading plaintiff in what could be a massive Second Amendment challenge in Washington D.C.
Russell is challenging D.C.’s prohibition on “off-body” carrying of firearms, which includes carrying a gun in a purse. This issue holds personal significance for Russell; she survived an armed assault in 2015 thanks to a weapon she carried in her purse.
Russell is challenging D.C.’s prohibition on “off-body” carrying of firearms, which includes carrying a gun in a purse. This issue holds personal significance for Russell; she survived an armed assault in 2015 thanks to a weapon she carried in her purse.
Veteran CNN Anchor Departs Network, Advocates for Gun Rights in Legal Battle - Page Traveler
Posted from pagetraveler.com
2nd Amendment
Supreme Court
Washington
Edited 2 mo ago
Posted 2 mo ago
Responses: 5
12
12
0
You would think the left would be supportive of a woman wanting to be a woman and carry a pistol in a purse but in reality the left uses woman like everyone else. If they really cared about women, abortion would have been codified decades ago. They dont, they simply dont and just use people as victims.
(12)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Progressive Democrats, RINOS, and Communists care only about power and money for themselves. They will lie, cheat, steal, and do or say anything to keep their power and money. MHO
(10)
(0)
(4)
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
CPL Douglas Chrysler - If the Dems really cared about women and abortion as they claim, they would have codified abortion as legal and pro. Not my personal stance but how they would have done it as they claim to support. Abortion in reality is just votes from people the want to make as victims and save.
(3)
(0)
6
6
0
5
5
0
They didn't like the fact that when she had to use it, she didn't have it on her body!!! LOL, as others have brought up, a female (or any small person) would be at a disadvantage to conceal a pistol on their body. Women are further at a disadvantage as their clothing my be lighter in nature adding to the problem. So they charger her and from what I understand take away her permit for illegal carrying a firearm.
(5)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google