Avatar feed
Responses: 6
CWO3 Us Marine
1
1
0
Don't understand signing statement "Constitutionally flawed"? That's sort of an admission of sorts, maybe? He just needs to choose his words better sometimes, because he's giving the nit-picking media lots of material. They've already got their Imagineering hats on in plain view.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ James Woods
1
1
0
"Seriously flawed"? Of course he would say that about a bi-partisan bill that even the GOP overwhelmingly supported. Interesting how GOP leaders insist Russian interference is a red herring yet were fully behind the sanctions bill. What does that tell us?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Trevor S.
1
1
0
Asking for your speculation here. What would the media's reaction have been if he would have vetoed it?
(1)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
MAJ Bryan Zeski
7 y
They would have been ecstatic. It would have been another clue into the Russian-connection. AND then it would have been overturned in Congress, thereby solidifying the President's lack of power. It would have been a two-fer for the media. The sanctions bills, especially with how easily it went through Congress, was a lose-lose for the President.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close