Posted on Nov 25, 2024
Trump Could Prompt Supreme Court Ruling on Birthright Citizenship
50
1
5
0
0
0
Posted 5 h ago
Responses: 3
When a person here posts; " 14th Amendment be damned." shows this is an emotional issue that would take a united front to change. I don't see us uniting over much of anything anymore.
(0)
(0)
The only way this changes is through a Constitutional amendment. Democrats at a minimum will never agree and we will likely never get 2/3rds in both houses or 2/3rds of the States (34) to force it. That said, without a major tragedy related to birthright citizenship affecting this country, this will not happen. The best we can do is mplement better border security and remove the incentive of anchor babies from being able to bring their immediate and extended families into the country. Simply being born here does not negate the fact we can still deport the kid's parents along with the kid under their care. When that kid is no longer under the care of their parents or family members, for whatever reason, they can return to the US, assuming they have all the correct documentation to prove they were born in the US. I have no problem with kids being born here as anchor babies, but it should not be a means for their parents and extended families to also stay here.
(0)
(0)
I highly doubt this will go to SCOTUS.
Birthright citizenship is very clearly outlined in the Constitution. 14A begins "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
The only conceivable interpretation which would potentially remove birthright citizenship is claiming that children of illegal immigrants are not subject to US law. But if that is true, then we ALSO have no authority to deport them - or to try them or jail them for crimes, tax them, or do anything else. They would be ACTUAL SovCits.
If this goes to court at all, I see it being tossed out by the first court to see it, and every subsequent court refusing to review an appeal. No way SCOTUS grants cert on this.
Birthright citizenship is very clearly outlined in the Constitution. 14A begins "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
The only conceivable interpretation which would potentially remove birthright citizenship is claiming that children of illegal immigrants are not subject to US law. But if that is true, then we ALSO have no authority to deport them - or to try them or jail them for crimes, tax them, or do anything else. They would be ACTUAL SovCits.
If this goes to court at all, I see it being tossed out by the first court to see it, and every subsequent court refusing to review an appeal. No way SCOTUS grants cert on this.
(0)
(0)
SFC Eric Harmon
Probably correct, what we need is an amendment to stop the abuse of this practice. Also a thing that probably won't happen. Maybe if we deport the parents?
(1)
(0)
MAJ Montgomery Granger
Wishful thinking. This SCOTUS will consider arguments brought before it and the original intent of our President being a "natural born citizen," and what it means to have loyalty to another sovereign nation. Dual citizenship is problematic, especially when considering the oath of citizenship, which requires loyalty to only the US. We have suffered through one President (Obama) who was foreign born (he stated himself that he was the "first Kenyan born Senator"), and first Vice President anchor baby (neither of Kamala Harris's parents were US citizens when she was born here, and spent 6th grade through first years of college in CANADA. No more anchor babies. 14th Amendment be damned.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next