Avatar feed
Responses: 8
Lt Col Charlie Brown
8
8
0
Keep inventing, oops, discovering info until something sticks
(8)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Mark Odom
SSG Robert Mark Odom
5 y
Lt Col Charlie Brown Good morning ma'am. Have a wonderful day and please pass it on.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Multifunctional Logistician
LTC (Join to see)
5 y
Here is the headline- Second Democrat Intelligence Activists emerge as previous narrative failed to produce any facts.
(2)
Reply
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
5 y
My only surprise there isn’t many more, IC crooked as a dog’s hind leg, anonymity, protection, and a willingness by the House Judiciary to assist with the composure.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
MCPO Roger Collins
5 y
We have the transcripts and a denial on public TV by the Ukraine President. What are you going to believe a pack of proven liars sponsored and joined by hater Democrats or your lying eyes and ears. What’s the current payment to whistleblowing liars now?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Jeff N.
7
7
0
I am sure Kelly almost wet herself giving this report. The bottom line here is the original "whistleblower" (not really a whistle blower) tried to undermine the president with hearsay so the white house released the transcript of the call. Even if the new found whistle blowers heard the call we already have the transcript from the call so what are they adding? Nothing.

What we appear to have is intelligence (or lack thereof) community hold overs that are willing to remain anonymous and try to undermine the president. Not exactly a profile in courage. You can agree/disagree with Trump but the notion that his call contained anything even remotely "impeachable" is folly.
(7)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Cpl Jeff N.
5 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - Let me guess, you don't consider this an ad hominem attack : "He doesn't understand that some people don't like pathological liars, serial adulterers, bullies, misogynists, and racists". I know you said it about Trump, not me but it is an ad hominem attack none-the less. Correct?
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Cpl Jeff N.
5 y
SSG Robert Mark Odom - Mueller was asked directly during his testimo0pny if anyone obstructed his investigation. He provided a simple, one word answer "no". He filed no charges or provided no indictments for obstruction either. You don't like it because you bet the farm on Mueller and lost. I get it Greg. It sucks losing.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
Cpl Jeff N.
5 y
Capt Gregory Prickett - Nice misdirection but that is not what we are taking about. At 40 seconds into this portion of his testimony Mueller was asked directly if his investigation was "curtailed, stopped or hindered" . His answer was a direct "no".

You, in a classic misdirect, posted something he was asked about can a president be charged after they leave office. He wasn't even asked if he thought Trump could or would be charged. Why Greg, because he found no collusion or conspiracy or obstruction. So there is nothing, based upon the Mueller report to charge. Are you sure the legal profession is your calling?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPW1MAiYb6Q
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Mark Odom
SSG Robert Mark Odom
5 y
MSgt Kurt S. LOL! Thanks!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Stan Hutchison
5
5
0
The Trump supporters prove the old adage; "There are none so blind as those who will not see."
(5)
Comment
(0)
SSG Robert Mark Odom
SSG Robert Mark Odom
5 y
True!
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSgt Richard Kensinger
SSgt Richard Kensinger
5 y
Continued utilization of the defensive triad by his promoters: deflect, distract, and destroy all who oppose him.
Of course he is " stable genius, possesses the highestht IQ ever, knows more than "his generals", is the "greatest president ever", and hires "the best people". Me thinks not!
Rich
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close