Roy Moore said the last time America was "great" was during "slavery"

Technically pedophiles are only attracted to prepubescent children. A 14 year old is too old for a pedophile. Now those adults attracted to teens there are two names for:

Ephebophilia is the primary sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19. The term was originally used in the late 19th to mid 20th century.

Hebephilia is the strong, persistent sexual interest by adults in pubescent (early adolescent) children (especially those showing Tanner stages 2-3 of development), which is typically ages 11–14. Hebephilia is approximate in its age range because the onset and completion of puberty vary. On average, girls begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11 while boys begin at age 11 or 12. Partly because puberty varies, some definitions of chronophilias (sexual preference for a specific physiological appearance related to age) show overlap between pedophilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia.

If a child at 14 hadn't yet hit puberty - then yes an adult who had a sexual interest could be a pedophile. But generally clinically speaking pedophiles are attracted to kids under 13.

Thanks for the clarification! I should have reworded it, "... most likely a sexual predator of high school aged girls."

I guess they just couldn't find anyone who is not a Pedophile

MSG Joseph Cristofaro, after multiple women have come forward with similar stories, the yearbook evidence, and the whole banned from the mall thing, then yes, I'm satisfied that Moore's done some shady shit.

You will believe what you will and nothing will change your opinion. It still remains, whether you believe it or not, innocent until proven guilty. If he is proven guilty in a civil court of law, Sexual Harassment is a civil, not a criminal crime, I will concede he did the deed. Until then, speculation, interpretation, and innuendo have no bearing.

The fact that he said America was better during slavery, that fact about that statement. Did you not bother to read the original post?

1stSgt Nelson Kerr - This from the article:
"I think it was great at the time when families were united—even though we had slavery—they cared for one another…Our families were strong, our country had a direction."
Further:
"In stating this, Moore seemingly implied he'd be able to overlook the enslavement of other human beings as long as families are "united,"

He did not say America was better during slavery as you state, he said, "even though we had slavery"...a great difference. The article stated Moore implied he'd be able to overlook the enslavement of other human beings as long as families are "united." This statement is so far-reaching and false, the only implication that exists is in the blurred brain of the incompetent person who wrote the article.

And yes, I can read and read the article...note I spell read and read the same way. Will you now make an issue that I read what I said, or I said what I read.

Thank you for an interesting discussion.

He lied about families in slavery. Is he really stupid enough to belive fames were kept together in slavery or is he simplya fan of slavery. The basis for his comments is a lie promulgated by racists.

To Moore and a large part of his supporters those are not equal to whites so they do not matter. After all he is a open sup[porter of segregation..

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/10/13/1706655/-Roy-Moore-s-successful-crusade-to-keep-segregation-in-Alabama-s-constitution

MSG Joseph Cristofaro - I do not complain all that much about right wing media, I usually limit it to the tin-foil hat set and click-bait sites. The data is in many publications.
Was anything in the article I posted factually incorrect? Or are you just blowing smoke?