Responses: 7
According to an 'anonymous source' who was 'familiar with the case', they were almost charged with a committing a crime. Almost.
Except they weren't charged with a crime. Because no crime was committed. The only evidence of a crime comes from an anonymous source who alleges to have seen the evidence. Not going too far out on the limb of journalistic integrity are they?
Guilt by association and insinuation. No pesky trial necessary here. We have it from a competent, anonymous source, familiar with the case, who claims to have seen the evidence..............
And they wonder why people continue to doubt the press.
Except they weren't charged with a crime. Because no crime was committed. The only evidence of a crime comes from an anonymous source who alleges to have seen the evidence. Not going too far out on the limb of journalistic integrity are they?
Guilt by association and insinuation. No pesky trial necessary here. We have it from a competent, anonymous source, familiar with the case, who claims to have seen the evidence..............
And they wonder why people continue to doubt the press.
(9)
(0)
There is no such thing as close to being pregnant. Your are or you are not. There is no as being close to charged with a felony, you are or you are not.
Anonymous sources say something squirrely happened. Named sources who are known to have been there, done that say nothing untoward happened. Are we to throw away the presumption of innocence?
Anonymous sources say something squirrely happened. Named sources who are known to have been there, done that say nothing untoward happened. Are we to throw away the presumption of innocence?
(7)
(0)
Truer words have never been spoken about the Clintons, as well. I don't care about the Trump kids. I care only about the man who leads our country, Democrat, Republican or Anteater. I care about if they want our country to succeed.
(4)
(0)
Read This Next