Avatar feed
Responses: 3
Maj Robert Thornton
5
5
0
If they are not responsible enough at 18-24 then raise the voting age!
(5)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Software Engineer
Cpl (Join to see)
5 y
Yeah, it makes perfect sense that they want to lower the voting age, but raise the age you can own a semi-automatic firearm, yeah, no!

The people who's primary decision engine is emotionally charged shouldn't be making decisions. Insanity isn't a crime, but they shouldn't be allowed to legislate.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Whatever Needs Doing.
4
4
0
Maybe I need to clarify myself. Modern semi-automatic sporting rifles, no matter the appearance, are not "assault weapons". I do not subscribe to the "Grabbers" definition. There's is the psyops tactic of, Say it enough times and the sheeple will start believing it.
(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Cpl Software Engineer
3
3
0
So, are they going to raise the age of military service to 25? Considering the only real assault weapon is a military issued weapon, it only means a high school graduate would be ineligible.
(3)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Byron Oyler
MAJ Byron Oyler
5 y
Reading the article, this proposal lists several loopholes that someone under 25 could buy a weapon with a magazine that holds more than 10 rounds. I think it is bullshit, all they require for you to be drafted is age 18 and if those kids need to do special things to own a rifle similar to what they take to war, then the military age needs to be raised. I have long thought that either the drinking age needs to be 18 or draft age 21. You can kill a person in combat but not buy a beer at home?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close