Posted on Feb 15, 2017
Flynn resignation: Fox, Breitbart focus on leaks
1.21K
33
23
6
6
0
So let me get this straight.
Instead of being concerned about having someone on your staff that may have been compromised by a foreign nation, you are more worried about how that information got out?!?
This isn't a case of "snitches get stitches" and if it were, two words: whistleblower protection.
Instead of being concerned about having someone on your staff that may have been compromised by a foreign nation, you are more worried about how that information got out?!?
This isn't a case of "snitches get stitches" and if it were, two words: whistleblower protection.
Flynn resignation: Fox, Breitbart focus on leaks
Posted from money.cnn.comPosted in these groups: 
Donald Trump
Crime
Donald Trump Crime
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 9
6
6
0
They're not unconcerned. Investigations are taking place and have been for some time. Thus far, Flynn has not been found doing anything illegal. The problem is, it is HIGHLY illegal to leak this information and the means used to collect it. There is a mole, not a whistle blower and these leaks absolutely need to stop. If it continues, the American people will lose faith in our intelligence agencies, along with our government.
(6)
(0)
MSgt James Mullis
I would guess that there are SJW moles in every agency at this point. The problem is that they probably don't even think of themselves as moles.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
I am on the record as saying LTG Flynn was wrong. However, once again the progressive/democrat outrage machine really shouldn't be throwing stones at glass houses.
From Michael Ledeen, PJ Media, August 2014
"The actual strategy is detente first, and then a full alliance with Iran throughout the Middle East and North Africa. It has been on display since before the beginning of the Obama administration. During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shah’s rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine. Ambassador Miller has confirmed to me his conversations with Iranian leaders during the 2008 campaign."
Was this okay as well? Where was the progressive/democrat outrage when it was revealed a former ambassador was doing this before an election? Or did it just get thrown by the wayside because, gasp, Number 44 could do anything because he was the smartest, bestest guy ever to occupy the White House?
From Michael Ledeen, PJ Media, August 2014
"The actual strategy is detente first, and then a full alliance with Iran throughout the Middle East and North Africa. It has been on display since before the beginning of the Obama administration. During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic, and that they would be very happy with his policies. The secret channel was Ambassador William G. Miller, who served in Iran during the shah’s rule, as chief of staff for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and as ambassador to Ukraine. Ambassador Miller has confirmed to me his conversations with Iranian leaders during the 2008 campaign."
Was this okay as well? Where was the progressive/democrat outrage when it was revealed a former ambassador was doing this before an election? Or did it just get thrown by the wayside because, gasp, Number 44 could do anything because he was the smartest, bestest guy ever to occupy the White House?
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google