Posted on Nov 20, 2019
[BREAKING] Alexander Vindman ADMITS to Massive Lie – We Knew it All Along | State Department...
5.29K
92
27
21
21
0
Vindman lies...what a surprise (not). This is what happens when people have an inflated view of their own importance.
[BREAKING] Alexander Vindman ADMITS to Massive Lie – We Knew it All Along | State Department...
Posted from statedepartmentwatch.orgPosted in these groups: 
InvestigationU.S. House of Representatives
InvestigationU.S. House of Representatives
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 15
9
9
0
It's all political theater signifying Democratic fears that President Trump will be reelected setting back for decades their dream to fundamentally change America
(9)
(0)
9
9
0
"Implied", "perceived"... whatever.
If you're going to try and remove the President of the United States on a technicality, your facts have to be facts.... not theories. Speaking of "theories", I personally believe that at some point, in some way, President Trump mentioned Biden's activities to Ukraine, and very likely with the suggestion that something be "looked into" regarding them. I don't (yet) think he threatened to withhold aide until it that suggestion was acted upon... and even if he did; I'm not sure what's explicitly illegal about the President suggesting that investigating possible corruption should proceed receipt of said aid. This isn't Nixon's people digging up "dirt" on an opponent to facilitate a direct impact on a campaign... It's a sitting Chief Executive who has the backbone to call out the hypocrisy of political opponents who have shown zero restraint in their persistent, personal, and (in my opinion) fantastic attempts at re-acquiring power towards their own ends.
If you're going to try and remove the President of the United States on a technicality, your facts have to be facts.... not theories. Speaking of "theories", I personally believe that at some point, in some way, President Trump mentioned Biden's activities to Ukraine, and very likely with the suggestion that something be "looked into" regarding them. I don't (yet) think he threatened to withhold aide until it that suggestion was acted upon... and even if he did; I'm not sure what's explicitly illegal about the President suggesting that investigating possible corruption should proceed receipt of said aid. This isn't Nixon's people digging up "dirt" on an opponent to facilitate a direct impact on a campaign... It's a sitting Chief Executive who has the backbone to call out the hypocrisy of political opponents who have shown zero restraint in their persistent, personal, and (in my opinion) fantastic attempts at re-acquiring power towards their own ends.
(9)
(0)
SGT Tom McWilliams
Guess my opinion is a little too risque for tonight. Very well articulated Sir. Kudos to you LCDR. Kudos!
(1)
(0)
LCDR Joshua Gillespie
SP5 Dennis Loberger - I'm not arguing that Biden wasn't a focus of any discussion-personally, I'm fairly certain he was, whether it was specifically stated or not. My point is that I don't personally see anything improper with the sitting President calling a spade a spade.
(0)
(0)
5
5
0
They should Courts Martial this guy and send him to DB Leavenworth for 40 years at hard labor. He is a disgrace to the uniform in my opinion.
(5)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google