Posted on Oct 29, 2019
As Wildfires Burn In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom Declares A State Of Emergency
1.45K
26
11
3
3
0
But yet silence from the WH.
Because of petty disagreements .
There a a few million people who will remember this lack of concern
Because of petty disagreements .
There a a few million people who will remember this lack of concern
As Wildfires Burn In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom Declares A State Of Emergency
Posted from npr.orgPosted in these groups: 
Office of the President (POTUS)
US Forest Service
Office of the President (POTUS) US Forest Service
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 4
6
6
0
NEWSOM: "That said, every single request we've made of the Trump administration to get through these wildfires has been met. They have been absolutely responsive, and I have been very public in acknowledging that and applauding that."
(6)
(0)
MSgt Michael Bischoff
So is he afraid to publicly admit to helping California? I don’t get it he so vocal about some of the petty issues but not a peep publicly here.
Can you you explain?
Can you you explain?
(0)
(0)
LT Brad McInnis
Orange man bad really rots people's brains to the point they can't even read the crap they post... funny isn't it?
(4)
(0)
Maj John Bell
MSgt Michael Bischoff - Perhaps President Trump is has not a public peep because he doesn't want to offend voters like me. I'm tired of people expecting sympathy and assistance in dealing with problems of their own making.
Governor Newsom's comment "That is unacceptable. I completely reject this notion that it's going to take 10 years. Look. We've had a decade-plus of mismanagement of our largest investor-owned utility, PG&E - greed and complete dismissal of public safety." is utter nonsense.
Fire science is real simple: Fuel-Oxygen-Heat. The one most easily managed, and managed with economic benefits is fuel. California has GOT to allow managed reduction of dead fall and undergrowth. Until then this problem won't go away until the forests burn down. What is the environmental impact of massive wildfires? How are all the species they protected served by having the forest burn down around them?
Governor Newsom's comment "That is unacceptable. I completely reject this notion that it's going to take 10 years. Look. We've had a decade-plus of mismanagement of our largest investor-owned utility, PG&E - greed and complete dismissal of public safety." is utter nonsense.
Fire science is real simple: Fuel-Oxygen-Heat. The one most easily managed, and managed with economic benefits is fuel. California has GOT to allow managed reduction of dead fall and undergrowth. Until then this problem won't go away until the forests burn down. What is the environmental impact of massive wildfires? How are all the species they protected served by having the forest burn down around them?
(4)
(0)
SPC Casey Ashfield
Why read when you can attack Trump for not doing exactly what you think he should be doing? TDS mindset 101.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
MSgt Michael Bischoff
I did read it, like I stated above why has he not mentioned publicly. He is so vocal on petty issues , so why isn’t he bragging about helping lowly California
(0)
(0)
(1)
(0)
Sgt John Steinmeier
MSgt Michael Bischoff - So you are upset that President Trump isn't lauding himself over "his" assistance to California. You are such a Pooh Bear.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
MSgt Michael Bischoff NO ONE has suggested removing trees from any proximity to power lines. We will cut the power hundreds of thousands of citizens, but, “Oh no, we cannot cut down a Green Tree”!
The City of Laguna Beach, perhaps 50 miles down the CA Coast from Los Angeles employs several herds of Goats (as many as 100 Goats per herd), to clear the underbrush on the sides of their canyons. Laguna has suffered fires a few years ago, now they are being proactive in reducing the cities risk of fires.
The City of Laguna Beach, perhaps 50 miles down the CA Coast from Los Angeles employs several herds of Goats (as many as 100 Goats per herd), to clear the underbrush on the sides of their canyons. Laguna has suffered fires a few years ago, now they are being proactive in reducing the cities risk of fires.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google