Posted on Dec 19, 2023
3
3
0
Tin foil hat time. Congressional and electoral college representation is not based on the number of citizens in a state. It is based on the number of residents (citizens, non-citizen legal residents and illegal aliens), as reflected in the latest census. Are democrats flooding the nation with illegal immigrants intentionally to keep blue states blue (with a higher number of congressional seats and electoral votes). If you look at the top 15 state destinations for illegal aliens, 12 are blue states. Based on the last census and estimates of illegal aliens residing in California, 2 of California's 54 congressional seats and 56 electoral votes are awarded based on the number of illegal aliens residing within the state. Just saying...
FACT CHECK: Has Citizenship Been A Standard Census Question?
Posted from npr.org
Congress
Democrats
Conspiracy Theories
Posted 11 mo ago
Responses: 2
2
2
0
The Republicans tried to get citizenship added to the census but it failed...
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
This is from 2018...based on when Sarah Huckabee Sanders was WH press secretary...
"After a controversial decision by the Department of Commerce to add a question about U.S. citizenship to the 2020 census, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defended the move as nothing out of the ordinary." "This is a question that's been included in every census since 1965," Sanders said Tuesday, "with the exception of 2010, when it was removed."
Response (from 2018): This statement is inaccurate, incomplete and misleading. A quick history of the decennial survey makes that clear.
Did you not think it was weird that it quoted Huckabee Sanders as the WH press secretary? I'm confused why you're posting an article from 2018. Did something come up about the census again?
I'm more concerned with how invasive the census surveys are - with questions like asking people what time they leave for work or how many bathrooms they have. Why does the government need to know this? And if you refuse to fill out any portion of it, you could be fined under Title 13 of the US Code.
It sounds like the census ir really ridiculously invasive for no reason. Ultimately. But nowhere in this article does it talk about voting. So what are you talking about conspiracy for - the conspiracy might be why is the government trying to collect so much personal data on people?
"After a controversial decision by the Department of Commerce to add a question about U.S. citizenship to the 2020 census, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders defended the move as nothing out of the ordinary." "This is a question that's been included in every census since 1965," Sanders said Tuesday, "with the exception of 2010, when it was removed."
Response (from 2018): This statement is inaccurate, incomplete and misleading. A quick history of the decennial survey makes that clear.
Did you not think it was weird that it quoted Huckabee Sanders as the WH press secretary? I'm confused why you're posting an article from 2018. Did something come up about the census again?
I'm more concerned with how invasive the census surveys are - with questions like asking people what time they leave for work or how many bathrooms they have. Why does the government need to know this? And if you refuse to fill out any portion of it, you could be fined under Title 13 of the US Code.
It sounds like the census ir really ridiculously invasive for no reason. Ultimately. But nowhere in this article does it talk about voting. So what are you talking about conspiracy for - the conspiracy might be why is the government trying to collect so much personal data on people?
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google