Posted on Mar 8, 2023
Newly Released Surveillance Footage Challenges Official Jan. 6 Narrative
1.76K
10
9
3
3
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
I saw plenty of raw footage while the event happened and have been laughing at the Jan 6 committee because I could see they were cherry picking only that which fit their narrative. I was laughing because they were acting as though they would never lose power and the other side of the story would never be revealed. Imagine how different the past two years might have been had there been an actual court trial with discovery and cross-examination of witnesses, instead of the Jan 6 Kangaroo Kourt.
(1)
(0)
It doesn't change the narrative at all. We all saw it happen in real time...him showing some cherry picked videos he chose to show means nothing.
Also why is McCarthy giving an entertainment pundit access to the tapes anyway? He's not a journalist. He never covers news. Even FoxNews, to win a lawsuit, said that no one takes Carlson seriously.
This is interesting: "House Speaker Kevin McCarthy granted Carlson access to more than 40,000 hours of the Capitol security footage from January 6. CNN and other news organizations have also requested access to the security footage. McCarthy’s office said it is still working out the process to make the footage “more widely available” but did not comment further. The speaker said Tuesday that the footage would be released to all media organizations, but did not say when."
So out of 40K hours of footage, that's what Carlson showed? And weird how no news organizations have gotten it but Carlson got it?
And: '“We do take security seriously, so before airing any of this video we checked first with the Capitol Police,” Carlson said. “We’re happy to say their reservations were minor and for the most part they were reasonable. In the end, the only change that we made was in blurring the details of a single interior door in the Capitol building.”
Multiple sources on Capitol Hill, however, told CNN that Carlson’s show provided only one clip to review and not the others."
I'm really not surprised to see who posted this and who is defending it...not surprised at all.
Also why is McCarthy giving an entertainment pundit access to the tapes anyway? He's not a journalist. He never covers news. Even FoxNews, to win a lawsuit, said that no one takes Carlson seriously.
This is interesting: "House Speaker Kevin McCarthy granted Carlson access to more than 40,000 hours of the Capitol security footage from January 6. CNN and other news organizations have also requested access to the security footage. McCarthy’s office said it is still working out the process to make the footage “more widely available” but did not comment further. The speaker said Tuesday that the footage would be released to all media organizations, but did not say when."
So out of 40K hours of footage, that's what Carlson showed? And weird how no news organizations have gotten it but Carlson got it?
And: '“We do take security seriously, so before airing any of this video we checked first with the Capitol Police,” Carlson said. “We’re happy to say their reservations were minor and for the most part they were reasonable. In the end, the only change that we made was in blurring the details of a single interior door in the Capitol building.”
Multiple sources on Capitol Hill, however, told CNN that Carlson’s show provided only one clip to review and not the others."
I'm really not surprised to see who posted this and who is defending it...not surprised at all.
(1)
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
CPT Jack Durish - "Facts..." You guys wouldn't know facts if they slapped you in the face.
(1)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff - I understand. Hold fast to your delusions. You have insulted us far too often whenever we respond to your rantings and I wouldn't want you to have to face reality now. Bless your heart...
(0)
(0)
Lets see it all...Demorats know what is out there and hthey have suppressed it...let's see it all and if it is bad well it is bad if it shows the other wa then well good but quit picking and choosing what we see.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next