Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SGT Mark Anderson
3
3
0
This kind of thing could go on ad nauseam in my opinion...never-ending. If ties to slavery are the criteria then it would seem that the Democratic Party should be seeking a new name for itself. I'm not casting aspersions on ANY party but I'm wondering if the names that would be chosen to replace the targeted ones would set off a new social and political firestorm by being agenda driven by any party. I, myself, strongly condemn any form of slavery or indentured servitude but sadly in its many insidious forms the two still exist in parts of the world and ...though both practices are despicable...I unhappily cannot see them being fully erased in the foreseeable future, try as we may.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen
2
2
0
I have a hard time getting into movements like this. Heck, George Washington owned slaves, should we petition to rename everything named Washington?
(2)
Comment
(0)
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
PO1 William "Chip" Nagel
>1 y
Lt Col John (Jack) Christensen Worthy of Debate! Time Will Tell! Society, Cultures, Values Change. "Perspective" can be a "Bitch" Sometimes.
(2)
Reply
(0)
LTC Eugene Chu
LTC Eugene Chu
>1 y
It depends on circumstances. We are not renaming everything that honors George Washington, but Mount Vernon explicitly mentions that he was a slaveowner and people under him were considered property at the time.

https://www.mountvernon.org/george-washington/slavery/
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Mark Anderson
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
My belief is that the name "Troost Avenue" does not reflect hatred but instead reflects a legal contemporary societal callousness...one did not have to hate the slaves in order to own them (UGH!).
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close