Posted on May 23, 2022
"She's In On It" - Former NBA Player Takes on Ilhan Omar
293
3
3
1
1
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
Former NBA players, DJ's, Quack TV Doctors, and Former WWE wrestlers? Fox sure does have a bunch of "experts". I sincerely hope Royce White is getting the mental health treatment he has needed for over a decade since that is what derailed his playing career of 3 NBA games. But if he does need money, this is a good grift for him.
(1)
(0)
You must have listened to a different interview than I did. He said it is ALL of Congress. He said she RAN as a radical who was going to shake things up, but as soon as she got there, she fell right in line with Pelosi. And this, she is in on it. Not she is the whole of the problem. But she is PART of the problem.
You can't be "in on it" and be the only one. Not what "in on it" means.
I would disagree with him that she just fell in line with Pelosi. The squad (and Bernie) has pushed Pelosi (and Biden) further left then I think Pelosi would like to be. So while Omar (and the rest of the squad) has fallen in line with Pelosi, it is only AFTER pushing Pelosi closer to where they want to be.
And yes, he is focusing specifically on the complicity of this one PARTICULAR Congress Critter because he is running against her. It would make no sense for him to discuss the complicity of Cori Bush or James Clyburn - or Kevin McCarthy. He isn't running against them.
You can't be "in on it" and be the only one. Not what "in on it" means.
I would disagree with him that she just fell in line with Pelosi. The squad (and Bernie) has pushed Pelosi (and Biden) further left then I think Pelosi would like to be. So while Omar (and the rest of the squad) has fallen in line with Pelosi, it is only AFTER pushing Pelosi closer to where they want to be.
And yes, he is focusing specifically on the complicity of this one PARTICULAR Congress Critter because he is running against her. It would make no sense for him to discuss the complicity of Cori Bush or James Clyburn - or Kevin McCarthy. He isn't running against them.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next